Hi guys! I'm a PC gamer, I don't own any of the new consoles, last one i had was a PS2. I'm trying to learn more and understand the new consoles, but not in terms of which one is better, but what each manufacturer have utilized, their strategy I guess...to get where they are at now.
From what I know, I see it as Nintendo, begin the longest with the console & gaming background has focused on pure gaming, and the fun of playing games. with strong franchises to back it up, and even though the console isn't that powerful, it's reached a broader demographic with its simple pick up and play style. But does this get boring?
Sony coming from a consumer electronics and media background have expanded that by utilized their technologies in a console, and bought it together with gaming. They bring something new with each console, CD player in the first, DVD, in the second, Blu-Ray in the third - but I think that was to get them ahead in the Blu-Ray /HD-DVD war, they took a gamble and included that technology, produce consoles at a loss, but got Blu-Ray out there... it looks like it paid off? But I'm not sure about the games...apart from the popular franchises (GT/Metal Gear etc) is the line up weak in general? is it harder for developers to bring it good games...
Microsoft has the pc background,internet and software technologies. there's a big line up of games, and a better on-line service then the other two. but i hear the reliability is quite bad with the 360?
I'm not sure what problems Nintendo have had with their console (apart from shortages, Sony seem to have problems from launch with shortages and the price, and just begin Sony in general (EU customers getting only a 40GB model etc).
Sorry if this is a long post, Not sure if I'm on the right track...What other situations are there? I'd like to here the views from people who know of and understand it all.
Thanks!!