not technically natively but yeah still impressive
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/06...sis_on_eee_pc/
not technically natively but yeah still impressive
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/06...sis_on_eee_pc/
Originally Posted by Fraz regarding the Apple Mighty Mouse
ahh that's pretty good, same would apply to laptops i'm guessing?
Damn thats cool.
Now I can play games on my EEE from school.
Awesome!
EDIT: So whats to stop someone running a web service where you have access to their super "Game server" for £20 a month so you only need a crappy rig to actually play the games on?
Genius!
haha glad it appeals to some people![]()
Originally Posted by Fraz regarding the Apple Mighty Mouse
I think it's cool but more than that I think this kind of thing is the way forward. No need to install, just run the client side applet and there you are.
Dreaming
C2D E6300 @ 2.8 | | Abit IP35 Pro | | 4GB Corsair XMS2 800 | | BFG 8800GTS OC2 320MB | | 500GB Western Digital for OS + 1500GB Seagate for Storage | | Antec NeoHE 550 | | Lian Li PC A05B | | Samsung 226BW 22"
That is really cool, I've been waiting for something like this for a while! It should mean you can play whatever you like on your nice HDTV without having to have a beast of a card on your media PC.
Now I just need a HDTV![]()
its good and all but it shouldnt be the way forward. Doing this uses more power and so your really screwing the earth over, dont really see the point of this as you would need a decent rig to play it anyways so why not just plug your tv/monitor to the decent pc and play it from there? shouldnt have to pay to mirror an image.
Waste of time and money on electric if you as me.
Maybe wasteful for the home but if, as FifthFreedom mentioned it goes the way of, in effect, a thin client system for gaming it's a lot more efficient. Instead of everyone having to buy a huge great big graphics card that they use a few hours a week, a server somewhere is doing all the processing instead, with it serving 'x' number of clients.
I didn't mean multiple clients simultaneously, that would, as you say, run like crap
You'd have multiple users over a period of time so it's more efficient as it's over-subscribed; like a broadband connection, you don't actually need to provide 8Mb to each home as not everyone is online at the same time.
Although maybe that's not such a good analogy seeing as contention ratio's suck![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)