"The only winning move is not to play" !
HOW ABOUT A NICE GAMES OF THERMONUCLEAR WAR?
WHICH SIDE DO YOU WANT?
1. UNITED STATES
2. SOVIET UNION
Printable View
2
...
Honestly I could never get into Planetside 2, It just felt like everything you do in the game is sort of pointless and has no change. Maybe I was just playing it wrong though.
There was this Barbie horse racing game my sister got for the PS2 when we were kids and I was forced to play it to help her out. It was just incredibly bad
test drive unlimited 2 the game was so fun but the broken servers killed it for me
Darksiders 1. The story is interesting but the gameplay and puzzles are just dumb.
Never manage to play that superman 64 game for huh...nintendo 64. Superman fly is so weird
Probably cliche' but honestly, Bad Rats is the first thing that came to mind. Sometimes you get a game for free, and it makes you wished you never played video games, ever.
Army days - Commodore 64
Leisure Suit Larry 8: Magna Cum Laude
Prior to this... thing... Larry games were hilarious, roll-on-the-floor-laughing every five minutes adventures. But like many attempts to bring an old franchise into a modern 3d world, it was also an utter failure.
Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel (Playstation 2, don't confuse with Fallout Tactics for PC) takes second spot.
Temple of Elemental Evil takes third place here. Disappointing and dull.
Odd one here. Shadow of mordor on PS3 (not PS4). That game was never optimised to run on PS3 properly. The result was a glitchy, buggy mess. I encountered some of the weirdest and most infuriating glitches of all time, which meant I never got to finish it. :(
Definitely X-Blades on the PC. It was such a repetitive hack n slash game but still managed to have the determination to finish it.
When No Man\'s Sky initially came out, I felt that had to be on of the worst games ever. Definitely did not live up to the hype and had missing features. Not only that, but the core gameplay itself also seems extremely boring, with most people stopping after a few hours. This is because the \'procedural generation\' that the game uses to create such a giant universe is essentially randomly selecting from the same basket of apples, so it\'s fairly repetitive. That\'s not to say some planets don\'t feature visually different features to other planets, just that it\'s ultimately all very \'samey\'.
ET on Atari! It has a cult behind it but back then it was just too far reaching for an 8 year old. Oh my bitter disappointment when my only other game was a generic 12in1 games cartridge.
It\'s actually a very good game for its time. Revolutionary in fact, but I was the most irritated with Grand Theft Auto III. It used cheap ways to make the game difficult like time limits to complete a mission. You can\'t open a full map in-game which is also stupid. The game assumes you already know the map and its districts, along with the car models present in them. Anyway, I\'m glad Rockstar learned from their mistakes and improvements in GTA: Vice City and subsequent titles.
a game in which you need to ride a bus for 8 hours !!!