Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: BF1942 or CoD UO?

  1. #1
    Senior Member Smudger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    St Albans
    Posts
    3,834
    Thanks
    643
    Thanked
    608 times in 444 posts
    • Smudger's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gbyte GA-970A-UD3P
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX8320 Black Edition
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 2x8G CML16GX3M2A1600C10
      • Storage:
      • 1x240Gb Corsair M500, 2TB TOSHIBA DT01ACA200
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX Radeon HD4890 1GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520
      • Case:
      • Akasa Zen
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Home
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 24"
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 200Mbit

    BF1942 or CoD UO?

    Quick bit of advice please.

    I can get Battlefield 1942 + expansions or UO for roughly the same price (an Ayrton), anyone any opinion on which I should go for? Or as they're only £10 should I just get both?

  2. #2
    Theoretical Element Spud1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    North West
    Posts
    7,494
    Thanks
    335
    Thanked
    313 times in 249 posts
    • Spud1's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Aorus Master
      • CPU:
      • 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 16GB GSkill Trident Z
      • Storage:
      • Lots.
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RTX3090
      • PSU:
      • 750w
      • Case:
      • BeQuiet Dark Base Pro rev.2
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus PG35VQ
      • Internet:
      • 910/100mb Fibre
    Well..

    i would say COD:UO, purely because i really don't like the original battlefield.

    BF1942 is great fun to play if you stick to vehicles, planes an whatever, but i hated the 'paper' feel that the weapons had, and the fact the the rifle classes were pants (sniper rifles should kill in 1 hit ffs, especially in a game set in ww2), I just didn't get on with it. Battlefield2 however is a totally different game It's actaully good this time around

    COD:UO is way too short, and a bit easy tbh, BUT it is great fun, classic COD action. even better if you have 20 quid get BF2 off ebay or second hand, you won't regret it, aside from WoW I play BF2 the most, even now 4 months(3?) after release

  3. #3
    Treasure Hunter extraordinaire herulach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bolton
    Posts
    5,618
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked
    172 times in 159 posts
    • herulach's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z97 MPower
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB WD Blue + 250GB 840 EVo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2* Palit GTX 970 Jetstream
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 850W
      • Case:
      • CM HAF Stacker 935, 2*360 Rad WC Loop w/EK blocks.
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1
      • Monitor(s):
      • Crossover 290HD & LG L1980Q
      • Internet:
      • 120mb Virgin Media
    Quote Originally Posted by Spud1
    Well..

    i would say COD:UO, purely because i really don't like the original battlefield.

    BF1942 is great fun to play if you stick to vehicles, planes an whatever, but i hated the 'paper' feel that the weapons had, and the fact the the rifle classes were pants (sniper rifles should kill in 1 hit ffs, especially in a game set in ww2), I just didn't get on with it. Battlefield2 however is a totally different game It's actaully good this time around

    COD:UO is way too short, and a bit easy tbh, BUT it is great fun, classic COD action. even better if you have 20 quid get BF2 off ebay or second hand, you won't regret it, aside from WoW I play BF2 the most, even now 4 months(3?) after release
    Ill admit most of teh rifles were pap, but how can you complain about 1 hit kills? If its ww2 then youd be more likely to get 1 hit kills cos of the lack of body armour etc. Hell, lets see you get shot with a handgun and still be able to run around bunny hopping everywhere and not even throw your aim off slightly.
    If you can battlefield vietnam then ++good, otherwise i wouldnt bother, call of duty was ace, never played UO though so i cant comment, i doubt youll find as many people playing either online with the advent of BF2 and the new COD

  4. #4
    Theoretical Element Spud1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    North West
    Posts
    7,494
    Thanks
    335
    Thanked
    313 times in 249 posts
    • Spud1's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Aorus Master
      • CPU:
      • 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 16GB GSkill Trident Z
      • Storage:
      • Lots.
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RTX3090
      • PSU:
      • 750w
      • Case:
      • BeQuiet Dark Base Pro rev.2
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus PG35VQ
      • Internet:
      • 910/100mb Fibre
    Quote Originally Posted by herulach
    Ill admit most of teh rifles were pap, but how can you complain about 1 hit kills? If its ww2 then youd be more likely to get 1 hit kills cos of the lack of body armour etc. Hell, lets see you get shot with a handgun and still be able to run around bunny hopping everywhere and not even throw your aim off slightly.

    I think you mis-read what i put I was saying there are not enough one-hit kills, ie a shot with a sniper rifle to the chest should have done 100dmg.

    anyway stick wtih COD, Pre BF2 the BF series was pap

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Addicted to CoD! ...anyone else?
    By poindextermatic in forum Gaming
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-03-2005, 05:50 PM
  2. CoD Multiplayer
    By RVF500 in forum Gaming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-12-2004, 03:04 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-11-2004, 02:01 PM
  4. BF1942 > where are the servers?
    By starside in forum Gaming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-08-2004, 07:42 AM
  5. bf1942 vehicle skins?
    By Pete in forum Gaming
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23-02-2004, 01:57 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •