Because they were made by Sega way back and then decided not to support them with the dreamcast went with Sony instead
Dreamcast was poop so good job EA![]()
Because they were made by Sega way back and then decided not to support them with the dreamcast went with Sony instead
Dreamcast was poop so good job EA![]()
Dreamcast was awsome.
NES, SNES, N64, GameCube, Wii, GBA, DS, PSone, PS2, PSP, PS3 60gb, XBOX, XBOX 360, Master System, Game Gear, Mega Drive, Saturn, Dreamcast, PC Engine, Neo Geo CD
The OP realy doesnt know what his talking about. the DC IMO was better than the ps2..
ignoring the irrelevant question of hardware, dreamcast games contained some of the best examples of their era - including Jet Set Radio and Rez
missing out on EA's finest like FIFA 2097 isn't a loss for the console - it helped raise the average game quality. however, without chav fodder like FIFA, the console sold poorly. that's nothing to do with any failing of the console - it simply wasn't interesting for the type of gamer whose shelf is EA-only
I have to agree with directhex, dreamcast had some awesome games, but it didn't have the lowest common denominator group of 600 other games to boost sales.
And yeah is this post going anywhere or just another pointless post about a boring games developer?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)