Sir, sir, is it because the points relate to the date of offence, not conviction, and that the date of offence has actually been put forward a year, so it'll stay on his license a year longer, not a yet shorter?
Sir, sir, is it because the points relate to the date of offence, not conviction, and that the date of offence has actually been put forward a year, so it'll stay on his license a year longer, not a yet shorter?
don't try this one at home folks...
BBC NEWS | England | Lancashire | Driver faked death to avoid fines
roffle
Tell them you are a high ranking police officer!!
Isn't the Date Of Conviction correct i.e. the date of the court case? The Date Of Offence is wrong by exactly a year. I'm not sure how points on your license work, are they removed after a set time from the date of the conviction or from the date of the offence if it's the conviction date it probably doesn't matter if it's the offence date then I get it change to 01/07/2006.
I read about a guy in Australia who had the date of offence written down as being his date of birth (anyone remember that story?). The letter he wrote them was brilliant and involved him crawling out of hospital on the day of his birth and joyriding a car he wouldn't own for over 20 years. They took off his points in the end based on this technicality. Perhaps the rules in the UK work the same way?
[edit]
My mistake - it was New Zealand: it's hosted here - Spiked Humour.
Last edited by Templar87; 21-01-2008 at 09:38 PM.
if the date of the conviction is early, lucky you. It will be wiped off earlier then.
I think we established it wasn't, and therefore he's losing out...
Yep, according to the information on the Directgov site, the page does confirm the offence date is used in this case. So the OP would be better off getting it amended.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)