View Poll Results: With dwindling fossil fuels, would you fly on/endorse a nuclear-powered plane?

Voters
44. You may not vote on this poll
  • Probably

    13 29.55%
  • Maybe

    4 9.09%
  • Not Likely

    27 61.36%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 43

Thread: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Question Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    Hi,

    My name is Dawson S and I'm a student from Australia. I'm currently completing a research project into the modern-day feasibility of a nuclear-powered aeroplane (as first suggested in the Cold War). I am to deliver this project in December at the Stockholm International Youth Science Seminars where I will attend the Nobel Prize ceremonies.

    I am interested in poll results from different community groups and as such I have approached this forum. Please vote above and comment below should you have any strong opinions. I only require opinions; I already have all of the scientific data I require for my project (this is one of the last sections I am to complete).

    Voting is to be done with any information you can muster, not information I provide.

    Thank-you for your help

  2. #2
    Senior Member ajbrun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    York, England
    Posts
    4,840
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    25 times in 13 posts

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    Surely this can't be safe if/when it crashes?

  3. #3
    TiG
    TiG is offline
    Walk a mile in other peoples shoes...
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Questioning it all
    Posts
    6,213
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    48 times in 43 posts

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    Surely the benefit of a nuclear powered plane would be made completely superfluous if we get the low orbit re-entry vehicles sorted. Uk to Australia in 2hrs....

    I can't see how nuclear powered plane would be able to compete.

    TiG
    -- Hexus Meets Rock! --

  4. #4
    HEXUS.social member Allen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    8,536
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked
    262 times in 168 posts
    • Allen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Maximus VIII Gene
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 6600K
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 8GB Kingston HyperX Predator DDR4-3000
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Samsung 950 PRO NVMe M.2 (OS) + 2 x 512GB Samsung 960 EVO in RAID 0 (Games)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 Ti OC
      • PSU:
      • XFX P1-650X-NLG9 XXX 650W Modular
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Node 804
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Home 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" BenQ XL2730Z + 23" Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 200Mbps

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    Quote Originally Posted by dawson300 View Post
    Voting is to be done with any information you can muster, not information I provide.
    So you want help with your project, but you expect us, on a PC biased technical forum, to either know about nuclear powered planes or research it ourselves?


  5. #5
    Salazaar Clone! mediaboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,538
    Thanks
    275
    Thanked
    31 times in 29 posts
    • mediaboy's system
      • CPU:
      • Phenom x3 8500
      • Memory:
      • 2GB
      • Storage:
      • 1320GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • HD3650 512MB
      • Operating System:
      • Windows Vista Premium x32
      • Internet:
      • T-Mobile Mobile Broadband

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    "Hello and this is your captain speaking. The temperature outside is currently 31 degrees celsius and I have to inform you that our nucleur reactor has a 0.0005% chance of exploding. As on the last 9995 trips this has not happened, I also regret to inform you that any survivers of this trip will grow an extra head and be rendered sterile.

    Thank you for your attention"


    The idea of terrorists driving a nucleur powered plane into the side of a building doesn't appeal to me either...
    Quote Originally Posted by Fortune117
    Kids are getting smarter, eventually no amount of parental controls will be able to stop them
    I guess we're expected to do quite well

  6. #6
    Efficiently lazy shadowmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,233
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked
    310 times in 208 posts
    • shadowmaster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5
      • CPU:
      • AMD Phenom II X4 965 @ 3.6Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Corsair XMS3
      • Storage:
      • Kingston SSD V series 64GB + Samsung F3 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX 5870 1GB in Crossfire
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet 1200W Dark Power Pro
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Stacker 832 SE
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 3 x BenQ G2222HDL 21.5inch 1080p
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    Quote Originally Posted by ajbrun View Post
    Surely this can't be safe if/when it crashes?
    +1, its way too dangerous, unless they can find some safe way to avoid a nuclear explosion if the plane crashes.

  7. #7
    Zzzzzzz sleepyhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,514
    Thanks
    373
    Thanked
    292 times in 162 posts

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    Why not plug the plane into the mains and have it electric powered.

    /sarcasm

  8. #8
    Senior Member Lanky123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Oxford
    Posts
    922
    Thanks
    91
    Thanked
    152 times in 101 posts
    • Lanky123's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 4570
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 4GB Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD + 2+4TB HDD + 3TB Synology DS216SE
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI Radeon R9 270X HAWK
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone Strider 400W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Sugo SG02B-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 / Ubuntu 16.04
      • Monitor(s):
      • ElectriQ 32" 4k IPS + Dell 22" U2212HM
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 60Mbit/s

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    Provided that I was satisfied the technology was safe I would have no problem with it. I might steer clear for a year or two to see how things went but I would be fine if safety was demonstrated.

    Out of interest what would the main advantages be? Economy with rising oil prices? Longer range flights?

  9. #9
    HEXUS.social member Agent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Internet
    Posts
    19,185
    Thanks
    739
    Thanked
    1,614 times in 1,050 posts

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    What's going to be done with the waste? Vented while flying over France?
    Quote Originally Posted by Saracen View Post
    And by trying to force me to like small pants, they've alienated me.

  10. Received thanks from:

    Clunk (14-09-2008),MaddAussie (14-09-2008)

  11. #10
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    I think the reason dawson300 isn't providing any information, requiring us to go seek it out, is to avoid him biasing his participants.
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  12. #11
    Senior Member Mithrandir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,746
    Thanks
    461
    Thanked
    370 times in 188 posts
    • Mithrandir's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Biostar TP45-HP
      • CPU:
      • C2D e4600 (w/ Xigmatek Red Scorpion)
      • Memory:
      • OCZ ReaperX (2x2gb)
      • Storage:
      • Samsung F1 500gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • xfx 9600gt Alphadog edition
      • PSU:
      • Xigmatek NRP-MC651
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Cavalier 3 silver (windowed)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Fujitsu Siemens SCALEOVIEW D22W-1

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    Even though air travel is one of the 'safer' forms of travel accidents do happen, and in the past year I think there must have been at least 5 serious crashes.



    It's far too dangerous to use.


    I think more investment should be ploughed into solar and wind powered hybrid planes with partial use of fossil fuel.
    Cavalier-X: Biostar TP45-HP ¦ E4600@3.1ghz - Xigmatek Red Scorpion (OCZ Freeze) ¦ OCZ ReaperX 2x2gb (792mhz @ 4-4-4--12) ¦ Xigmatek NRP-MC651 ¦
    Palit 8800gt ¦ X-fi Fatal1ty Gamer ¦ Coolermaster Cavalier 3 (Silver/Windowed) ¦

    Poseidon Magma: MSI P45 Zilent ¦ E6300@3.0ghz - Coolermaster Hyper 212 (MX-2) ¦ Corsair 2x2gb (880mhz @ 5-5-5-15) ¦ Corsair HX450w ¦
    xfx 9600gt Alphadog edition (780/1950/1000) ¦ X-fi Gamer ¦ Gigabyte Poseiden ¦

  13. #12
    handscombmp
    Guest

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    I'd be more worried about safety if a plane was to crash. Not only would it effect the plane crash but surrounding area. Also i'm not a nuclear physic but surely you need to have lots of water onboard for cooling i think and that would just add so much extra weight

  14. #13
    Senior Amoeba iranu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    On the dinner table. Blechh!
    Posts
    3,535
    Thanks
    111
    Thanked
    156 times in 106 posts
    • iranu's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus Gene VI
      • CPU:
      • 4670K @4.3Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb Samsung Green
      • Storage:
      • 1x 256Gb Samsung 830 SSD 2x640gb HGST raid 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI R9 390
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX620W Modular
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master Silencio 352
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 ultimate 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 23" DELL Ultrasharp U2312HM
      • Internet:
      • 16mb broadband

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    I watched a programme recently about US and Soviet attempts to produce a nuclear powered bomber in the late 50's and 60's. Basically if you wanted the crew to live to a decent age and father children you needed too much weight in the form of Lead shielding to make it a viable option. The closed cycle was the way to go because the open cycle polluted the atmosphere.

    Could we do it now? Yes we could but it would never be commercially viable for an airliner because you'd irradiate all of your passengers. The shielding to protect them would make the aircraft far too heavy.

    Alternative fuels for aircraft were widely used during WW2. For example fuels derived from feedstocks such as coal, natural gas, bio-oils and cellulose matter were widely used.
    "Reality is what it is, not what you want it to be." Frank Zappa. ----------- "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." Huang Po.----------- "A drowsy line of wasted time bathes my open mind", - Ride.

  15. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,456
    Thanks
    100
    Thanked
    75 times in 51 posts
    • Mblaster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS PK5 Premium
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 2500K
      • Memory:
      • 8gb DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Intel X25 SSD + WD 2TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia GeForce GTX 570
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520
      • Case:
      • Antec P180
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP w2207 (22" wide)
      • Internet:
      • Rubbish ADSL

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    Quote Originally Posted by dawson300 View Post
    I only require opinions; I already have all of the scientific data I require for my project (this is one of the last sections I am to complete).

    Voting is to be done with any information you can muster, not information I provide.

    Thank-you for your help
    Without the technical information on how the nuclear powered plane would work I can't make a decision on whether or not it's a good idea, some problems that would seemingly totally kill the idea have been mentioned earlier and without knowing how the prospective plane would overcome them (if at all) means I can't make a worthwhile decision.

    I have no problem with the concept, but it's the quality of the implementation of that concept that will decide whether or not I'm willing to fly on that plane.

  16. #15
    Senior Member JPreston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,667
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    124 times in 74 posts

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    Quote Originally Posted by shadowmaster View Post
    +1, its way too dangerous, unless they can find some safe way to avoid a nuclear explosion if the plane crashes.
    There wouldn't be a nuclear explosion triggered by one of the survivors shakily lighting a cigarette, but even if we assume all of the technological hurdles (eg not irradiating the passengers) could be ironed out - they can't, but even if they could - IMO there would be no way to satisfactorily administer the distribution of all the nuclear materials to the 10,000s of planes flying in and out and around the country with any degree of security.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bertrand Russell

    The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.

  17. #16
    Hexus.Jet TeePee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Gallup, NM
    Posts
    5,367
    Thanks
    131
    Thanked
    746 times in 442 posts

    Re: Research Poll: Public Support for a Nuclear Powered Aeroplane

    There has been no progress in airplane design since Concorde. OK, that's a slightly unfair statement. But the progress has all been towards efficiency. While a nuclear power source provides effectively unlimited clean propulsion, the weight penalty would make a commercial operation totally unviable.

    Let's put it another way. Airlines run not by providing good, fast efficient service, but by cutting costs to make their fares the cheapest. This is the fault of the consumer. We don't buy tickets by chosing an airline we like the service from. (If we did, we'd all fly Singapore!). We go on to travelocity or priceline or any of a dozen other websites which compare dozens of airlines and then we choose the cheapest ticket.


    The result is that these dozens of airlines compete not to provide the best, cleanest airplanes, but the cheapest fare. Since nuclear propulsion isn't (nor will it ever be!) cheaper than conventional jet engines, there will be zero interest from airlines.

    If you think about it, there has been no movement towards higher or faster flight, (apart from in corporate aviation) only towards carrying more people (A380) and greater efficiency (B787). The response from airlines to the high oil prices hasn't been a demand for different fuel sources, but reductions in capacity (especially in 50-seat jets), winglets for older airplanes, single engine taxiing, and charging for checked bags and meals.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •