Met Police commander gets 3 years for power abuse
Re: Met Police commander gets 3 years for power abuse
Sadly:
Quote:
BBC Home Affairs correspondent Danny Shaw said it was likely Dizaei would be released after three months due to the time he has already spent in jail.
And he's currently on a (presumably paid) suspension from his £90,000 a year job.
Re: Met Police commander gets 3 years for power abuse
Should have been far, far more, IMO.
Re: Met Police commander gets 3 years for power abuse
How dare he steal electricity while the rest of us have to pay for it!!
Re: Met Police commander gets 3 years for power abuse
Only 3 years? Really?
No wonder white collar crime is rampant these days.
Re: Met Police commander gets 3 years for power abuse
If he gets his job back after this then there's something seriously wrong.
He looks like a right bell-end from his photo as well.
Re: Met Police commander gets 3 years for power abuse
Quote:
Originally Posted by
aidanjt
Only 3 years? Really?
No wonder white collar crime is rampant these days.
But, should he really be locked for a white collar crime? It costs us money to lock him, feed him and everything.
Why can't house arrest be used more? :/
Re: Met Police commander gets 3 years for power abuse
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IronWarrior
But, should he really be locked for a white collar crime? It costs us money to lock him, feed him and everything.
Why can't house arrest be used more? :/
Or curfew, even if its at weekend/evening prisons....
That way someone can be productive member of society in the meantime, however I doubt given his responsibilities the reprobate should be able to keep his job!
Re: Met Police commander gets 3 years for power abuse
For non-violent offenders, electronic tagging and home curfew would be nearly as effective a punishment. Heck, I'm betting his other half is giving him a serious ear bashing on each visit, so getting it 24/7 is probably better!
Re: Met Police commander gets 3 years for power abuse
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IronWarrior
But, should he really be locked for a white collar crime? It costs us money to lock him, feed him and everything.
Why can't house arrest be used more? :/
He has now been convicted of a crime, so arrest isn't really the issue. And it isn't just white collar crime, it is betrayal of trust and an abuse of power which could have lead to a perversion of the course of justice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lucio
For non-violent offenders, electronic tagging and home curfew would be nearly as effective a punishment. Heck, I'm betting his other half is giving him a serious ear bashing on each visit, so getting it 24/7 is probably better!
The sentence isn't just about punishment and retribution, it is also about deterrence to other would-be offenders.