Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 38

Thread: Body Beautiful?

  1. #1
    IBM
    IBM is offline
    there but for the grace of God, go I IBM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    West London
    Posts
    4,187
    Thanks
    149
    Thanked
    244 times in 145 posts
    • IBM's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P5K Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Intel E6600 Core2Duo 2.40GHz
      • Memory:
      • 2x2GB kit (1GBx2), Ballistix 240-pin DIMM, DDR2 PC2-6400
      • Storage:
      • 150G WD SATA 10k RAPTOR, 500GB WD SATA Enterprise
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Leadtek NVIDIA GeForce PX8800GTS 640MB
      • PSU:
      • CORSAIR HX 620W MODULAR PSU
      • Case:
      • Antec P182 Black Case
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407WPF A04
      • Internet:
      • domestic zoom

    Body Beautiful?



    Was watching the news (while at the gym ) and saw a piece regarding fashion designers being pressured to create designs for a more 'normal' figure given that the average ladies dress size in the UK is now a 14 - 16.

    Now, I've never agreed that the stick insects strutting their way up and down the various catwalks of the world - trying not to break their fragile ankles due to a diet shamefully lacking in any nutritional value - are healthy role models. They're not. But why on earth is pressure mounting to cater for people who should be making an effort to loose weight and be healthy FOR THEIR OWN GOOD.

    I'm all for having a healthy self image, but since when did this involve one person stuffing their face with kettle chips and Mars bars while the REST OF THE WORLD changes their perception to make the individual feel better. Why are we (the general public) having to work so hard so the overweight individual doesn't have to?

    And it's not as if those people who make up the average dress size are healthy or maintain good diets. If that was the case, I wouldn't be having this rant. In all probability they can't handle stairs too well, aren't great fans of vegatables, or portions that aren't supersized. So why are we trying to tell these people (through acceptance in all levels of society) that it's alright to be overweight and out of shape?

    I know there are people who have glandular issues (a far smaller percentage than people would have you believe) and I'm all for catering to their needs, and having amazing designers create beautiful clothes for them, but that's for the right reason.

    People need to loose weight, not be told that it's alright to be fat.

    /
    sig removed by Zak33

  2. #2
    Spanked Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,430
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    26 times in 23 posts
    yeah, but along with losing weight, this country needs to sort out its mainstream diet and lifestyle . . .

  3. #3
    Photographer; for hire!! shiato storm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    next door
    Posts
    6,977
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    6 times in 5 posts
    i can see your point. quite why retailers have to make a bit thing about selling larger sizes indicates strongly that more and more people are not doing enough to themselves to stay healthy. I have noticed this in recent months when gettng things, usually I'm a medium - its not skin tight by any means but at the same time its not flapping around on the floor loosely. now I wear 'small' and tbh its a better fit and ever so slightly closer, but not much different.
    I'm almost 6' and not a stick person, 30-32" waste etc. and thanks to the rowing i do - muscles (). I hav, and still do, find problems when trying on trousers - the waste might fit ok but the actual leg parts are way too narrow, like trying to fit into a pair of kids trousers [not that I have]. i wouldn't say i'm overly muscley but lets be clear about this; sizes and proportions of people are changing, and wy do designers assume a 30-32 waste person has to have skiny legs? on the other end of the scale, which I can't really comment on, is there a suden leap to fat waste fat legs?...
    i think they determine leg diameter on the Log scale...and its attrocious.

    oh yeah, back on topic - I hate the fact I find I'm having to get things to suit the growing numbers of fat people's needs...we live in times of excess, and if they didn't eat so much everyone would be far better off.
    Powered by Marmite and Wet Dog
    Light Over Water Photography

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    12,116
    Thanks
    906
    Thanked
    583 times in 408 posts
    Part of the same thing tho aint it Acid?

    Food is fuel, simple as that...

    Put the wrong fuel in your car and what does it do...

  5. #5
    Time for Walkies... Atomic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    1,959
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ibm
    Now, I've never agreed that the stick insects strutting their way up and down the various catwalks of the world
    Little off topic, but anyone ever thought that catwalk models look like blokes? ie. very little to no boobs and no hips?

    Every wondered why?

    How many fahion designers are gay males? Conisidence?

  6. #6
    Spanked Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,430
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    26 times in 23 posts
    Part of the same thing tho aint it Acid?
    Yeah . . . but Ive just woken up so I dont get it.

    wy do designers assume a 30-32 waste person has to have skiny legs?
    yeah this pisses me off too.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    12,116
    Thanks
    906
    Thanked
    583 times in 408 posts
    Catwalk models are too skinny...

    Size 14+ is fat....

    Size 10/12 is spot on IMHO....

  8. #8
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Near Birmingham
    Posts
    25
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    As far as fashion designers , being encouraged to design clother for "the larger figure" I think this comes to economics. Because the average size of people is becoming larger this dictates that so must the clothes that are produced. The only reason that catwalk models are so thin is because they have the figure to pull off wearing the clothes that the designers produce, they want their product to be seen in the most appealing light.

    In high streets shops do you ever see an ugly or fat person on POS????

  9. #9
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Near Birmingham
    Posts
    25
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by [GSV]Trig
    Catwalk models are too skinny...

    Size 14+ is fat....

    Size 10/12 is spot on IMHO....
    Yeah I agree 10/12, saying that depends.......

  10. #10
    Time for Walkies... Atomic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    1,959
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Alf Alpha
    In high streets shops do you ever see an ugly or fat person on POS????
    Nope the fat ones are the middle aged managers...

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    12,116
    Thanks
    906
    Thanked
    583 times in 408 posts
    I'm guessing you havent shopped in Leicestershire before Alf

  12. #12
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Near Birmingham
    Posts
    25
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by [GSV]Trig
    I'm guessing you havent shopped in Leicestershire before Alf
    Ha ha. Did go to Leicester once! The ugly people werent on the POS though!

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Aston University
    Posts
    53
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I'm a petite size 6 and finding clothes is really difficult for me. It's embarrassing having to buy age 12 trousers when I'll be 19 at the end of the year!!! Retailers should cater for smaller people more as well!
    Who said big is best?

  14. #14
    I took the road less traveled by Scientist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    536
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by [GSV]Trig

    Size 10/12 is spot on IMHO....
    Yep pretty much my view, 14+ is overweight and why everything must change to cater to people are overweight is beyond me....
    Had I the heavens' embroidered cloths,
    Enwrought with golden and silver light,
    The blue and the dim and the dark cloths
    Of night and light and the half-light,
    I would spread the cloths under your feet:
    But I, being poor, have only my dreams;
    I have spread my dreams under your feet;
    Tread softly, because you tread on my dreams.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    12,116
    Thanks
    906
    Thanked
    583 times in 408 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by little me
    I'm a petite size 6 and finding clothes is really difficult for me. It's embarrassing having to buy age 12 trousers when I'll be 19 at the end of the year!!! Retailers should cater for smaller people more as well!

    At the end of the day retailers will stock what sells...
    People are getting fatter so they will stock more fat persons stuff than petite stuff...
    Have you tried shopping online, probably more choice than shopping on the high street, unless u find a specific petite type shop....

    /I know shopping online isnt the same for you girls but deal with it, shopping isnt meant to be fun

  16. #16
    One skin, two skin......
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Durham
    Posts
    1,705
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    14 is not necessarily overweight! Tall ladies?
    What about big boobs? That can be enough to push you from a 12 to a 14!
    14 would be overweight for someone who is 5 ft!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Most beautiful piece of Hi-Fi kit ever?
    By Rave in forum Consumer Electronics
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-05-2004, 07:12 PM
  2. more body modding *yay*!
    By Elmo in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 07-05-2004, 07:47 PM
  3. Does any body knows how this 48wk 1800+ is locked
    By Jesus in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 17-01-2004, 12:02 AM
  4. body roll...
    By 5lab in forum Automotive
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 22-10-2003, 09:41 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •