Bit rich coming from someone that's sharing opinions on marginal rates of tax when they don't even know what it means
Still, at least that makes you no worse than the general voting public.
Anyway, I did read the link within the link after looking again and seeing that one word was highlighted in blue and wasn't just advertising. The author of the link within the link stated the likely reasons for the high rate of work being good in work benefits that make working less costly/easier. The Author you linked to completely ignored that and just decided that meant that marginal rates have no little to effect on people working. Rather than considering that perhaps some of the higher marginal rates mentioned may reduce the effectiveness of the well planned in work benefits system.
i.e. if some of the marginal rates were reduces, said Scandinavian countries may end up with even better rates of employment.
So I stand by my previous statement, despite this new (to me) information. That's not evidence. It's conjecture. P.S. Please look up the definition of the word conjecture before replying. We wouldn;t want you commenting on something you don't understand now, would we