I made a post that I thought important and gives what I think is important evidence towards an important subject and people claim firstly that i’m ‘trying to get traffic to my site’ which is absurd because it was medium.com, one of the largest article submission sites on the internet whilst someone else brazenly without a single shred of actual knowledge claims it to be a ‘wordpress website’ another absurd statement.
Only for someone else to make claims that the content of the article was bias in any shape or form aside from the places where I had clearly stated they were my options and the thread gets closed before I can answer any questions and defend the article.
Is it honestly general civility to allow people to make such absurd claims and then not give the op an opportunity to defend it.. that so just so wrong!


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
- but there's inevitably some that gets through. There's also a fairly low tolerance for nonsense on here - for instance, we don't really attract fanboys in any direction, and brand-based discussions on Hexus tend to focus more on the relative benefits of each architecture, rather that the "<brand-name> suxxors" level of discussions you might see elsewhere.


, I have a twitter account that is used for minor debate, i’ve never got emotionally tied to one yet, but I think i’ve probably annoyed a fair few myself.
