Originally Posted by
Saracen999
Yes it is, and with that in mind, be cautious about becoming too awkward, about being the one insisting on "sticking to rules". It shouldn't be used as a reason to target you but believe me, there's a very real risk it will be. He who sticks head above parapet gets shot at.
There's a judgement call to be had here. Obviously, don't stand for anything that puts you at serious risk, but be aware that squeaky wheels don't always get oiled: sometimes they just get replaced. It seems to me the next year or two, maybe more, are going to be a buyer's (employers) market.
Also, on lugging chairs, PCs etc back and forth, while yes, it's a right PITA, there is also logic behind it. Risk assessments require mitigating risk and not sharing chairs, monitors, etc, is one part of it. And benefits both sides. Also, if a desk/workstation area is being shared, it makes either nightly or between handover periods that much easier to deep clean what's left.
Also, government advice on "should work from home" is changing, at least in messaging. Last time I checked written guidelines, it still said that but be aware that BoJo has been suggesting returning to work where possible, rather than WFH where possible. My guess? Big office landlords are starting to get edgy about big employers (like banks, insurance companies and even gov't departments) cutting their office requirements significantly and permanently, having got a sniff of potentially massive economies to be had.
A radio chat a couple of weeks ago suggested that some people had serious productivity increases when working from home (like 20% and more) doing the same hours. On the other hand .... some people didn't.
Partly, it's environmental, like do you have a suitable, preferably separate, space? But psychology is a big factor too. Some people just aren't psychologically suited, and are too susceptible to the major distractions - bed, TV and fridge.
Also, I suggest caution in pushing the childcare angle. Yes, from your end of the telescope it's important. But consider the employer's view from their end of the telescope .... kids can be a bigger hit on productivity than bed, TV and fridge combined. If I were you, I'd stress the productivity gains end of it. Maybe track down that research I mentioned. And keep schtuum about childcare. It may well be very important to you, but I'd not mention that to the employer. It isn't, after all, what they're paying for.
On a much more general note, as someone that worked from home for, well, since about 1990 until (early) retirement, if my employer were expecting to save money on office space rents by getting people working from home permanently, I sure as hell would be looking at getting compensated for dedicating part of my home, even part-time, to WFH office space.