Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 18

Thread: Size, is it really important?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    11,597
    Thanks
    763
    Thanked
    476 times in 328 posts

    Size, is it really important?

    Fonts here look a load smaller now on my 19" tft, too small infact, what's the recommended res for the site now as I've had to turn up my font size...

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Nott'm, East Midlands
    Posts
    1,954
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Yeah the fonts do seen a tad small and I only run 1024!

  3. #3
    MD
    MD is offline
    Ex-HEXUS.net Staff MD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,366
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked
    137 times in 60 posts
    • MD's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-M PRO
      • CPU:
      • i5 - i3570k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 256GB SSD's (Samsung and Crucial)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVidia 640
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 600W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08e MATX
      • Operating System:
      • Win 8
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Dell Flat Panel
      • Internet:
      • 60mb Virgin Media
    the fonts are the same size as before, but they are a different font.

    Your eyes will get used to it, mine have and I have been staring at this code for over a week in various shapes and forms.

    Matt.
    Please do not message me about Scan Free shipping, I no longer work for HEXUS.net

  4. #4
    F.A.S.T. Butuz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    4,708
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked
    72 times in 59 posts
    • Butuz's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z77 MPOWER
      • CPU:
      • I7 3770K @ 4.6
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair XMS 1866
      • Storage:
      • Sandisk SSDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 3xR9 290
      • PSU:
      • be quiet! Dark Power Pro 10
      • Case:
      • Inwin H Frame
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
    I run my Xerox 17" tft at 1152x864 as any more is just too small. Luckily this monitor rescales to lower than its native res really really well.

    Butuz

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bournemouth, Dorset
    Posts
    1,631
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    looks fine to me
    check "my system" for me monitor

  6. #6
    Comfortably Numb directhex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    /dev/urandom
    Posts
    17,074
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked
    1,027 times in 678 posts
    • directhex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus ROG Strix B550-I Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 5900x
      • Memory:
      • 64GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Seagate Firecuda 520
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNOVA 850W G3
      • Case:
      • NZXT H210i
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu 20.04, Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 34GN850
      • Internet:
      • FIOS
    r.e. "different font", has it changed from a windows-only font to a different windows-only font? i see no font changes here

  7. #7
    MD
    MD is offline
    Ex-HEXUS.net Staff MD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    6,366
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked
    137 times in 60 posts
    • MD's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-M PRO
      • CPU:
      • i5 - i3570k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Vengeance
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 256GB SSD's (Samsung and Crucial)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • NVidia 640
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 600W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08e MATX
      • Operating System:
      • Win 8
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Dell Flat Panel
      • Internet:
      • 60mb Virgin Media
    quite possibly, I think it may have...
    Please do not message me about Scan Free shipping, I no longer work for HEXUS.net

  8. #8
    Senior Member specofdust's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    794
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Looks better to me. I like the various changes that I've noticed so far. The smaller type(even on 1600x1200, everything always annoys me by how unneccesarily large it is, in general) and the extra space for a quick reply. I like.

  9. #9
    Civilian Nick F's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,668
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked
    18 times in 10 posts
    • Nick F's system
      • CPU:
      • 2.4Ghz C2D
      • Memory:
      • 4GB
      • Storage:
      • 320Gb internal / 750Gb external
      • Case:
      • Apple iMac
      • Operating System:
      • Mac OSx
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24inch
      • Internet:
      • 8mb BE connection
    Now I am using a Mac this forum looks 3 times better

  10. #10
    Banned myth's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    alone in life
    Posts
    2,553
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I can read it just fine... No probs at all!



  11. #11
    Comfortably Numb directhex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    /dev/urandom
    Posts
    17,074
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked
    1,027 times in 678 posts
    • directhex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus ROG Strix B550-I Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 5900x
      • Memory:
      • 64GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Seagate Firecuda 520
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNOVA 850W G3
      • Case:
      • NZXT H210i
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu 20.04, Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 34GN850
      • Internet:
      • FIOS
    font: 10pt tahoma, verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;

    all of those are microsoft fonts, bar helvetica and the sans-serif fallback.

    verdana (what i'm using) and arial are available for free, as part of a brief crack-smoking moment by microsoft to give away "core web fonts" for "interoperability"

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    11,597
    Thanks
    763
    Thanked
    476 times in 328 posts
    I'm not saying it doesnt look better in general, just the font seems smaller, other than that it does look a lot tidier...

  13. #13
    Lovely chap dangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    8,398
    Thanks
    412
    Thanked
    459 times in 334 posts
    • dangel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • See My Sig
      • CPU:
      • See My Sig
      • Memory:
      • See My Sig
      • Storage:
      • See My Sig
      • Graphics card(s):
      • See My Sig
      • PSU:
      • See My Sig
      • Case:
      • See My Sig
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • See My Sig
      • Internet:
      • 60mbit Sky LLU
    Does look a lot smaller to me too (1600x1200) tbh.
    Crosshair VIII Hero (WIFI), 3900x, 32GB DDR4, Many SSDs, EVGA FTW3 3090, Ethoo 719


  14. #14
    Photographer Bobster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Sunny Dorset
    Posts
    3,395
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked
    339 times in 285 posts
    • Bobster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte AX370 GAMING K7
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 7 2700
      • Memory:
      • G.Skill FlareX 32GB DDR4 3200
      • Storage:
      • 42TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte Vega64
      • PSU:
      • Corsair CS700M
      • Case:
      • SilverStone TJ05
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG LG 27UD88-W, LG 27 ColourPrime, HP LP2475w
      • Internet:
      • 16Mb
    1600x1200 on my formac 2010 can read it fine .. but then i've always had small font sizes since the days of running 1600x1200 on my old 17" back in '96

  15. #15
    Senior Member specofdust's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    794
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Guess it depends on your screen size. If you're running 1600x1200 in a 19" or god forbid a 17" monitor then I can see it'd be really small, but for a 21" it looks great. Neater, nicer, less bloaty.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bournemouth, Dorset
    Posts
    1,631
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    tired it on a few monitors (differnt resolutions) on varies pc's around the house and tbh it looks fine !

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Changing partition size ?
    By Ben_UK in forum Software
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 25-01-2005, 01:57 AM
  2. Raid 0 array - chunk size and allocation unit size
    By iranu in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 13-07-2004, 09:02 AM
  3. NTFS cluster size
    By luap.h in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 13-04-2004, 03:14 PM
  4. 8mb cache more important than size?
    By Stewart in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 27-10-2003, 02:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •