Couldn't believe this one....
I was listening to the Ian Collins show very early this morning (on TalkSport). A supposedly experienced photographer who was apparently also skilled in 'the ways of the computer', rang in as a psuedo-guest/caller. The guy was dreary and inaccurate enough to start with, but then the presenter brought up something he had heard about only recently:
Ian Collins: "Now, unlike most, you don't keep your photographs on drives do you... You keep them on.. eh... discs, right?"
Photographer: "Yes, that's right."
Ian Collins: "Yeah, just I heard recently that when you keep them on discs, you can lose the photos after 3 years" - He went on further to elaborate, but he made it very clear that he was talking about the degredation of CDs over time, and the consequent corruption/loss of data, etc.
Photographer: "Ah well, I don't have that problem. *very matter-of-factly* You see, there are two images I use, JPEG, and TIFF..... Everyone knows what a JPEG is, but TIFF is 'loss-less'. That means, I can open and close it on the disc as many times as I want, without the quality being lost.
... I'd imagine every geeky type in Christendom listening was shouting at the radio... How someone who apparently knows 'so much' about the subject can get something so wrong is beyond me. Needless to say, the presenter got several emails stating that CDs are read-only etc, but it would appear nobody clarified that the man was confusing compression with CD degredation.
I get so tired by such stupidity, more often than not on TV. PC World adverts especially, where they say "High tech PC with DVD"... They could quite legally bundle a cheap DVD-R disc with the PC and get away with it.
Comments? I'm sure I'm not the only one who gets irritated by such things.