Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Wireless monitor

  1. #1
    HEXUS.Metal Knoxville's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Down In A Hole
    Posts
    9,388
    Thanks
    484
    Thanked
    442 times in 255 posts
    • Knoxville's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Intel X58
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 920
      • Memory:
      • 2GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATi HD3450
      • PSU:
      • Generic
      • Case:
      • Cheap and nasty
      • Operating System:
      • Vista 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" LG LCD
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 20mb

    Wireless monitor

    I know you can get just about anything else wireless but is there anything out there i can use to make my monitor wireless.

    Plan is to have my computer on the other side of the room so i'd like no wires from the stuff on my desk to my shuttle.

  2. #2
    Cable Guy Jonny M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Loughborough Uni
    Posts
    4,263
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    4 times in 1 post
    Sharp make an LCD TV which is wireless.

    Costs over a grand though.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    77
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Wireless monitor eh? That would kick ass. I doubt there is such a thing though

  4. #4
    If your 5555... Swafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Then I'm...
    Posts
    6,666
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    its possible

    if they did it with tvs, why not monitors? to be fair lcd tvs cost a load more than monitors, im sure theyd be a fair few hundred less than 1000 if they existed

    all it needs it some sort of bluetooth dongle on the dvi port, and a bluetooth screen connection, and a big rechargable battery
    Quote Originally Posted by Knoxville
    As I find big muff's to be a bit of an aquired taste
    AMD Athlon 4400X2 @ 2.565PenisextentionMhz
    Dual Layer, Gold Plated, LED Power,Dual Golden OMG IT MAKES MY CodPiece BIGGER 1-1-1-1 DDR62.3 @ 1222.3433Mhz
    5 X 400GB Porn Array
    X1800XT Dildo enchanged 3D Version, 512MegaLongJohn
    Oh, did I mention.....I like sheep.....


    WWW.MrsBurley.CO.UK
    now updated

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    888
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Swafeman
    its possible

    if they did it with tvs, why not monitors? to be fair lcd tvs cost a load more than monitors, im sure theyd be a fair few hundred less than 1000 if they existed

    all it needs it some sort of bluetooth dongle on the dvi port, and a bluetooth screen connection, and a big rechargable battery
    just did a quick calculation, and for my monitors current resolution (1280x1024 at 85Hz, 32 bit colour depth) you need a 3.4Gigabit/second connection to shift that amount of data. You'd need something a bit stronger than BT.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Omnipresent
    Posts
    293
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Im sure you can... i remember seeing something on microsofts website that was exactly what youre asking about Knox. They had a portable wireless monitor that was being used in a seperate room fron the actual PC itself.

    I dont have any linkage unfortunately, but Im certain I saw it. Could have been a concept product tho.

  7. #7
    dgr
    dgr is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    621
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    well actually microsoft have withdrawn research into the wireless monitor. they cost ~ tablet pcs but aren't clever - go figure...

    sharp do make them, but they are the sole producer.

    oh and bluetooth is less than 1mbyteps - good luck .

    best bet is a tablet pc. if you need the power of a decent pc, VNC onto a desktop...

    dgr
    dothan 745 @ 2.4ghz | 2gb Corsair XMS (2-3-3-6) | dual raptors (raid0) | ATI 9700pro | CM201 | dual lg 1810

  8. #8
    Sublime HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Void.. Floating
    Posts
    11,819
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked
    233 times in 160 posts
    • Stoo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Mac Pro
      • CPU:
      • 2*Xeon 5450 @ 2.8GHz, 12MB Cache
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 1600MHz FBDIMM
      • Storage:
      • ~ 2.5TB + 4TB external array
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI Radeon HD 4870
      • Case:
      • Mac Pro
      • Operating System:
      • OS X 10.7
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Samsung 244T Black
      • Internet:
      • Zen Max Pro
    Quote Originally Posted by Byatt
    just did a quick calculation, and for my monitors current resolution (1280x1024 at 85Hz, 32 bit colour depth) you need a 3.4Gigabit/second connection to shift that amount of data. You'd need something a bit stronger than BT.
    Yeah, but that's with zero data compression or encoding, if you can run a large screen with something like radmin with ease over ethernet, I'm sure with dedicated hardware on the case you could knock it down to acceptable levels.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

  9. #9
    HEXUS.Metal Knoxville's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Down In A Hole
    Posts
    9,388
    Thanks
    484
    Thanked
    442 times in 255 posts
    • Knoxville's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Intel X58
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 920
      • Memory:
      • 2GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATi HD3450
      • PSU:
      • Generic
      • Case:
      • Cheap and nasty
      • Operating System:
      • Vista 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" LG LCD
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 20mb
    Cheers guys, looks like that idea may not work then, ah well........back to the drawing board it seems

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Richmond
    Posts
    217
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    What you're probably after is called a "Smart Display". Shove that into Google and the first thing you should see in the MS link : http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sma...ay/default.asp

    The project has been canned, and the 2nd link you'll see is titled "Smart Display is dead"

    Seemed like a good idea but the products developed were damn expensive and not actually that good at what they were supposed to do (allegedly )

  11. #11
    If your 5555... Swafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Then I'm...
    Posts
    6,666
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    ba you know what i mean something like bluetooth, id uno what, maybe an uber wifi, probably still too slow tho
    Quote Originally Posted by Knoxville
    As I find big muff's to be a bit of an aquired taste
    AMD Athlon 4400X2 @ 2.565PenisextentionMhz
    Dual Layer, Gold Plated, LED Power,Dual Golden OMG IT MAKES MY CodPiece BIGGER 1-1-1-1 DDR62.3 @ 1222.3433Mhz
    5 X 400GB Porn Array
    X1800XT Dildo enchanged 3D Version, 512MegaLongJohn
    Oh, did I mention.....I like sheep.....


    WWW.MrsBurley.CO.UK
    now updated

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    LONDON
    Posts
    318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Byatt
    just did a quick calculation, and for my monitors current resolution (1280x1024 at 85Hz, 32 bit colour depth) you need a 3.4Gigabit/second connection to shift that amount of data. You'd need something a bit stronger than BT.
    I was thinking the same as you, initially, but I think we could be confusing graphics bandwidth with an LCD-matrix - which essentially is just a list of values that need to refresh approx 75 times per second (or 85 etc...) - most of the work is done by the gfx card which generates the image perameters - all that the device would have to transfer would be digital data (intensity of crystals - which ones are lit etc...) in the same way that it does over conventional DVI - however, on the face of it it would need more than Blue Tooth

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Petersfield, UK
    Posts
    1,755
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    hhm...thats a bit odd, i was saying 2 days ago it would be a cool thing invent. along with bluetooth headphones. never have to untangle wires...
    | XP1600-m | ASUS AN78X Deluxe | r9700 pro | 2x512mb pc37000 |

  14. #14
    Administrator Moby-Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    There's no place like ::1 (IPv6 version)
    Posts
    10,665
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    385 times in 314 posts
    I'm sure you could use an ethernet KVM and a wireless bridge to get quite close
    my Virtualisation Blog http://jfvi.co.uk Virtualisation Podcast http://vsoup.net

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. wireless stuff (dlink)
    By DizMatt in forum Networking and Broadband
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21-11-2003, 02:48 AM
  2. Hardware monitor
    By ad75 in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 17-09-2003, 10:56 AM
  3. M$ wireless desktop for £45!!!
    By Spud1 in forum Retail Therapy and Bargains
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 16-09-2003, 09:31 PM
  4. Wired+Wireless home network purchasing recommendations...
    By D001 in forum Networking and Broadband
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-09-2003, 11:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •