Anyone got a 4870X2?
I'm thinking about buying one. How are people getting on with them?
Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Anyone got a 4870X2?
I'm thinking about buying one. How are people getting on with them?
Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Last edited by The Asgard; 30-08-2008 at 09:15 PM.
i was going to get one but the heat and power draw did it for me
I7 920 | P6T DLX | GSkill PI 1600 | ??? | vRaptor 300GB
I think I would just save the bother and buy the 280GTX, it's pretty good value now.
Unless you are playing above 1920 x 1200 then it will make little difference anyway.
That's maybe because at lower resolutions both cards perform almost the same to each other (depending on game)
So unless you're playing on a resolution above 26", the X2 won't do any better, in fact, I think the 280 would outperform the X2 on resolutions lower than that.
1920 x 1200 thats the res i will be using the 280 at . when it ever gets in stock
Yea, the X2 is definitely a bit overkill. GTX280 all the way, it's currently on my mental wish list!
While true for todays games how much longer before we get another crysis situation where we need to move down a res even with a 4870 x2. With all those stream processors games with up to 24x caafff or what ever they call it will scale well on a 1920 x screen. Apart from crysis which does not like any gfx card!!! Most games need a 30" screen to really benefit but as a I said if you crank everything up in CCC you can stress the card at 1920 x and there will be games in 6 months to a year that will come along that may require settings to be turned down. I believe that the ATI cards will 'play' better with future games but time will tell.
Poo
Probably true BUT we can live in hope. Beleive me though even on a 1920 x res when you turn on all the settings in CCC you start to stress the card BUT MY GOODNESS do things look good. Friend has one in his system and when the 24 CFAA is switched on the performance does start to drop (although his cpu may cause some of that)
Poo
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
I really do wish people (shaithis not directed at you in particular) would stop worrying about Crysis performance (I believe Hexus have stopped using it in reviews now for this very reason) it is after all 1 game which from all points of view (ATi and nVidea) was badly conceived, ATi and nVidea have improved performance by tweaking drivers etc but personally I would have them spend time making them better for all games and increasing stability rather than concentrating on optimising them for a particular title which is never going to see the performance it should from the current cards because of how it is coded.
I agree. Alot of people won't even want to play Crysis and when that's the only game used for testing it doesn't really help people to pick hardware as most games will have much better frame rates.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)