Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Cheap dedicated GC better than VGA?

  1. #1
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Cheap dedicated GC better than VGA?

    Hi all. I'm putting a cheap machine together for a friend of mine. Normally that leads you down the onboard VGA.

    What I was considering is as far as I'm aware onboard VGA emulates (as it were) a GPU by taking resources from the RAM and CPU.

    That being the case, would it be considered better to buy a seperate GPU, even one as cheap as the ATI Wildcat-10-M02 which is £9 at scan!

    Cheers very much

    Ash

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    519
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    16 times in 14 posts
    • McPhee's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8H67 Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 2400
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Crucial DDR3-1033
      • Storage:
      • 128GB Kingston SSDNow V2+
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX460
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet 550W
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • 19" Samsung 941BW
      • Internet:
      • 1Mbps

    Re: Cheap dedicated GC better than VGA?

    What are your uses, and what onboard video were you looking at? Some of the AMD chipsets are really good, perfect for general desktop use, light gaming and HD video playback.

  3. #3
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Cheap dedicated GC better than VGA?

    Email, Internet, notepad, youtube, DVD.

    Nothing heavy. Very possibly some online flash animations.

    I've not got that far yet, I have never ever even considered a board with VGA and know nothing about them so I'll have to put some research in before choosing first.

    With the card at <£10 though in my head it's a no brainer but I thought I'd ask you fine chaps first.

  4. #4
    finding nemo staffsMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,498
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked
    794 times in 741 posts
    • staffsMike's system
      • Motherboard:
      • evga 680i
      • CPU:
      • e6600
      • Memory:
      • geil ultra pc6400
      • Storage:
      • WD 320gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • leadtek 8800 GTS 640mb
      • PSU:
      • ocz gameXstream 700w
      • Case:
      • akasa eclipse
      • Monitor(s):
      • dell 2007wfp and Lg L194WT
      • Internet:
      • pipex homecall

    Re: Cheap dedicated GC better than VGA?

    While they do take RAM you can choose how much they take.. from as little as 32mb usually. If it's something like AMD's 780G chipset then just go for onboard as you will get everything you need from it.

    Something like an ATi HD4350 would do nicely but honestly you're just using more power for little or no benefit.

  5. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Cheap dedicated GC better than VGA?

    Quote Originally Posted by staffsMike View Post
    While they do take RAM you can choose how much they take.. from as little as 32mb usually. If it's something like AMD's 780G chipset then just go for onboard as you will get everything you need from it.

    Something like an ATi HD4350 would do nicely but honestly you're just using more power for little or no benefit.
    Super, thanks for the advice.

    It will have 4g of memory anyway so it wont notice the loss. It's overkill I know but £32 for 4g 800mhz Corsair XMS2 is just too cheap to argue with.

  6. #6
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    31,621
    Thanks
    3,757
    Thanked
    5,060 times in 3,912 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Cheap dedicated GC better than VGA?

    Quote Originally Posted by AshMcD View Post
    What I was considering is as far as I'm aware onboard VGA emulates (as it were) a GPU by taking resources from the RAM and CPU.
    The integrated graphics card are graphics cards stuck on the motherboard.They generally use the system RAM although some themselves have their own RAM. There is no emulation going here!!
    If anything these graphics cards usually have hardware to offload the playback of HD media from the CPU.

    An example is the AMD 780G which has HD3450 graphics core on the motherboard and shares the system RAM. The 790GX has the same graphics core as the 780G but clocked higher and with its own DDR2 or DDR3 RAM.

    Quote Originally Posted by AshMcD View Post
    That being the case, would it be considered better to buy a seperate GPU, even one as cheap as the ATI Wildcat-10-M02 which is £9 at scan!
    Actually the description is wrong as the card is an HD2350. This is an HD2400 with 32bit RAM and no UVD. This means that it cannot accelerate HD media playback.

  7. #7
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,231
    Thanked
    2,291 times in 1,874 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: Cheap dedicated GC better than VGA?

    To answer the actual question, generally the cheapest last generation graphics card will be better than the latest onboard graphics. So, a Radeon 3400 series card will be better than onboard graphics. *But*, with the AMD 780G /790GX and NVidia 8000 / 9000 series chipsets, the difference is a lot smaller than it used to be. Certainly if there are going to be no games played then it is a no-brainer: the onboard graphics will more than suffice. Even the older AMD 690G chipset will do the job.

    When I started building computers it was possible to buy some really cheap motherboards without graphics, and integrated graphics were still really bad, so it was often the same price for a cheap board and discreet graphics card as for an integrated board with worse graphics. Nowadays, though, the cheapest motherboards have reasonable integrated graphics, so buying a board + discreet card will always be more expensive.

    In other words, invest about &#163;50 in a motherboard with onboard ATI or NVidia grpahics, and you'll be fine

  8. #8
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    27
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Cheap dedicated GC better than VGA?

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    In other words, invest about £50 in a motherboard with onboard ATI or NVidia grpahics, and you'll be fine
    There has been a lot said about ATI above but you should definitely look at the nvidia integrated graphics 8200/8300 GPU based motherboards.

    Note sometimes the cheapest G31 board plus a cheap dedicated graphics can be cheaper than these integrated solutions. Also remember if the motherboard goes it takes the graphics core with it although less of a problem if the graphics core goes you can plug in a dedicated card.

    Good luck

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. DVI to HDMI or VGA - which is best ?
    By machinist in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 25-07-2007, 12:06 PM
  2. VGA 'Noise'
    By Avalon in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 18-03-2007, 02:14 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •