err, what's wrong with 16:9? Give me the choice between a 1920x1080 monitor and a 1680x1050 monitor and I'll take the former. Why would you pay more for lower resolution screen? For what? 16:10 aspect ratio. Pffff if it was 1920x1200 I might understand - I wish I could find one cheaper than the U2410 then I might have chosen differently - but a 16:9 1920x1080 still has both more vertical and horizontal real estate on screen than a 1680x1050. The U2311h can be had for £200 and as a U series comes with Dell's 3 year no dead pixel, no bright sub pixel guaranty. Better deal all round
IMO.