http://www.pcgamer.com/graphics-card-comparison/
Some interesting results there. What do you think?
http://www.pcgamer.com/graphics-card-comparison/
Some interesting results there. What do you think?
Hexus used to publish "HEXUS.bang4buck" charts like this at different resolutions. I guess they do become quickly out of date with changing prices, and throw in overclocked models and a couple of different resolutions and it quickly will become a massive task to maintain.
Weird they've got the price for the RX 470 4GB and 8GB varieties in the price chart, but don't specify which in the graphs - I'm guessing it's the 4GB though!
TPU in their reviews do several performance to x graphs, shame the "bang for buck" is in USD.
i5 4690K @ 4.9GHz CPU@1.255v 4.4GHz Cache@1.10v - Archon SB-E X2 - Asus Maximus VII Ranger
Kingston HyperX Savage 16GB@2400MHz 1T - Sapphire R9 Fury X (1145/545 Custom ROM, ~17.7K 3DM FS)
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB - Cooler Master V850
R7 1700@3.8GHz - Archon IB-E X2 - Asus Crosshair VI Hero - G.Skill Trident Z 3200MHz C14 - Sapphire Fury X (1145/545 Custom ROM, ~17.2K 3DM FS)
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB - Cooler Master V850
I wonder how the 1050 (and probably more specifically the Ti variant) will effect this chart, they look like promising cards for casual gamers.
These are useful comparisons but as already stated, they do end up out of date quickly. Add in one off sales and discounts and it gets more complicated.
Really though, I'm just waiting to see how AMD's vega 10 will stack up in price/performance!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)