just noticed this
http://www.microdirect.co.uk/Product...9948&GroupID=0
didnt even know 4ms panels existed ! its quite dear, is it worth the extra over, say a 12ms?
just noticed this
http://www.microdirect.co.uk/Product...9948&GroupID=0
didnt even know 4ms panels existed ! its quite dear, is it worth the extra over, say a 12ms?
AMD Athlon 4400X2 @ 2.565PenisextentionMhzOriginally Posted by Knoxville
Dual Layer, Gold Plated, LED Power,Dual Golden OMG IT MAKES MY CodPiece BIGGER 1-1-1-1 DDR62.3 @ 1222.3433Mhz
5 X 400GB Porn Array
X1800XT Dildo enchanged 3D Version, 512MegaLongJohn
Oh, did I mention.....I like sheep.....
WWW.MrsBurley.CO.UK now updated
I think its only 16.2 million colours
16.2 isn't the same as 16.7. The 16.2 is dithered up from less colours and looks terrible.
It better reffered to as 18BPP and 24BPP imo. At 18BPP, you get 262,144 possible different colours. At 24BPP you get 16,777,216 so quite a HUGE differnce. Interpolation makes up this difference. The method of the interpolation is different for each brand and affects the quality a lot. Viewsonics are possibly the best although Ive not tryed every TFT.
I hardly notice it atall on my vx912 (12ms 19") - but then I dont notice any ghosting in anything atall on this tft. I think a 24bit TFT would be nicer than 18bit even if the responce time were doubled esp. if they start making 24bit at <=16ms.
I expect the rating to be exactly the same as all the other mS ratings which is grey to white?
Last edited by SilentDeath; 10-07-2005 at 03:40 AM.
Not actually tried an 18 bpp monitor so I have no idea how bad it looks. Both of mine are 24.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)