LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksLinky: http://graphics.tomshardware.com/gra...l#3d_mark_2005
The X800 seems to beat the 6800 in every test, even in Doom 3, where nVidia's cards are generally stronger.
Linky: http://graphics.tomshardware.com/gra...l#3d_mark_2005
The X800 seems to beat the 6800 in every test, even in Doom 3, where nVidia's cards are generally stronger.
"Well, there was your Uncle Tiberius who died wrapped in cabbage leaves but we assumed that was a freak accident."
Thats a 6800 256mb? Aren't they a fair bit slower tha the nomral 128mb one?
Just found this:
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatal...dtek_SALE.html
Leadtek 6800 for £111Inc. Now that is a steal.
Not that I was aware of. I would expect the extra memory to give it a speed boost, at least at higher resolutions. And I don't particularly fancy the thought of buying from that store!Originally Posted by Smokey21
"Well, there was your Uncle Tiberius who died wrapped in cabbage leaves but we assumed that was a freak accident."
LOL............. and i thought i was helping.
strange, all the reviews show it with 980mhz memory. the HIS card def has faster memory than 900mhzI thought I'd seen an overclocked Gigabyte X800 too, but all I can find now is this... Gigabyte X800
This says 700Mhz RAM
Don't they advertise the overclock?
the x800 has 12 pipes and a 256bit interface. Just like the x800pro
Mike, just had a look around and that 256mb 6800 on Toms, has clock speeds of 325/600, where a normal 6800 is 325/700, so it's memory is a whole 100mhz slower, thats a fair difference. And the 256mb is a complete waste, the card is far to slow to utilize it.
I think I'm just going to get something nice and cheap i.e. a 9800 Pro, and be done with it for the next year (unless games really start to need a better system).
"Well, there was your Uncle Tiberius who died wrapped in cabbage leaves but we assumed that was a freak accident."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote