Well it will be 550 for core and 1800mhz of 1.1 memory , so it can OC to 2ghz !![]()
It will be fasttt
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=27368
Well it will be 550 for core and 1800mhz of 1.1 memory , so it can OC to 2ghz !![]()
It will be fasttt
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=27368
E2160 @ 2.9 GHz ¦ ABIT IP35-E ¦ Geil Ultra 4x1 Gb ¦ 8800 GT ¦ Antec Sonata ¦ Logitech G5 ¦ Sennheiser PC150 ¦ Saitek Gamer Keyboard ¦ ViewSonic VA1912w
And expensive. 1800mhz on the memory is impressive.Originally Posted by NikolaX
"Reality is what it is, not what you want it to be." Frank Zappa. ----------- "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." Huang Po.----------- "A drowsy line of wasted time bathes my open mind", - Ride.
Yep. Wonder what this will mean in games. I really wanna see what it does in modern games at 1600x1200 with AA/AF compared to a 256 one. I might have to get one.![]()
thats me cardwill wait for BFG to get it on the shelves and purchase - then I'll just need an FX60 in the spring assuming its a dual core
Nox
Major R520 spanking.. X1800XT + Xfire had better be THAT good.
You'll need FX-60 + 50% more overclock to actually keep up wth this beast in SLI
Me want Ultrabook
OMG that is going to be insanely fast! Will it require a direct connection to an electricity pylon to work though?Originally Posted by NikolaX
![]()
Main PC: SUGO SG01B-F | MSI X79MA-GD45 | Core i7-3930k | 16GB Kingston HyperX DDR3-2133 | 256GB Crucial M550 SSD (OS/Apps) | 5TB Seagate Enterprise HDD (Data/Games) | MSI GTX970 Twin Frozr | Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit
Server: HP 8300usdt | Core i7-2500S | 16GB Geil DDR3-1333 | 256GB Crucial M550 mSata SSD/HGST 1TB HDD | VMWare ESXi 5.5
NAS: Synology DS1813+ | 8x5TB Seagate Enterprise HDD (30TB RAID 6)
HTPC: Shuttle SH67H3 | Core i5-2400S| 4GB Kingston HyperX DDR3-1600 | 64GB Crucial M4 SSD | XBMC with AEON NOX skin | Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit
I will be getting one when they are out![]()
Not really, modern games are GPU limited, look at FEAR. If you play at 1280 or less, you don't even need a GTX 256mb, let alone this.Originally Posted by sawyen
True but tests have shown that if you do play at a high res the proc limits the FPS no matterOriginally Posted by Smokey21
![]()
24-pipelines![]()
this makes me want to streal
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
more like 48 when you add them up in SLI.. we could be seeing a 700MHs core and 2000MHz mem overclock on water or something.. this is way way too cool..
Me want Ultrabook
You sure about that?:Originally Posted by kempez815
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/...0_gtx_scaling/
The difference at low res no AA/AF is big, as you'd expect, but look at 1600x1200, the difference between a 1.8ghz 3000+ and a FX-57 clocked a full 1Ghz higher is usual 1-2FPS.![]()
That is insanely fast, though the price is likely to be a number too big for my head.
I'll have your old oneOriginally Posted by Smokey21
![]()
Actually I just remembered it's not the best card on the market ...
http://komplett.co.uk/k/ki.asp?sku=314963&cks=PRL this is![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)