Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 25

Thread: confused with new X800xl card and 3D Mark 2001

  1. #1
    Senior Member theslasher@ntlw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    389
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    confused with new X800xl card and 3D Mark 2001

    I have just upgraded from a 9600pro to a X800Xl and in 3D Mark 2001 iam getting A Score of 14000 i thought i would be touching the 20000 mark am i right you can see the system soecs and i have the latest drivers and a freash install of XP.Help.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    1,020
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked
    26 times in 20 posts
    • [DW]Cougho's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Crosshair VI Hero
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 3600 @ 4.3 1900 FLCK
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Team Group DDR4 @ 3800 C16
      • Storage:
      • 512GB Samsung 870 EVO NVME & 1TB Samsung 850 Evo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX1070 G1 Gaming
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX760
      • Case:
      • Silverstone FT-05B
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • BenQ XL2730Z 1440p 144Hz
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 1
    3000 running on 166fsb....... 20k sounds very optimistic.

    All the same have you checked all settings in the drivers are set to performance etc.

    I wouldnt expect more than 16k or so tbh, as 01 is heavily based on your CPU and particularly the FSB.

  3. #3
    Senior Member theslasher@ntlw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    389
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I have run benchmarks for 2003 and 2005 they seam to be on track i just thought 2001 would give me a good score on the future web site most people get at least 18000 up.

  4. #4
    Banned StormPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,194
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    What were you getting on your 9600Pro?

  5. #5
    Senior Member theslasher@ntlw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    389
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I think i was getting about 8000 thought i would get more with the x800xl 4 vs 16 pipelines.

  6. #6
    Banned StormPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,194
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by theslasher@ntlw
    I think i was getting about 8000 thought i would get more with the x800xl 4 vs 16 pipelines.
    No. If you had a 3000+ A64 you could expect 20000+, but not with a stock AXP 3000+.

    This is about the best you can hope for @ stock:

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8786258

    The DX9 benchmarks like 2k3 and 2k5 are not nearly as CPU dependant. You will get much better performance jumps in those benchmarks, but not in 2k1.

  7. #7
    Senior Member theslasher@ntlw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    389
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Just done a new bench mark toped 16000 that makes me happy i rember my 9600pro benchmarking 2003 with the trolls it was doing 1fps now at least 28fps,

  8. #8
    Banned StormPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,194
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Yes, today's games will be much faster on the X800XL as well! Enjoy!

  9. #9
    Senior Amoeba iranu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    On the dinner table. Blechh!
    Posts
    3,535
    Thanks
    111
    Thanked
    156 times in 106 posts
    • iranu's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus Gene VI
      • CPU:
      • 4670K @4.3Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8Gb Samsung Green
      • Storage:
      • 1x 256Gb Samsung 830 SSD 2x640gb HGST raid 0
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI R9 390
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX620W Modular
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master Silencio 352
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 ultimate 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 23" DELL Ultrasharp U2312HM
      • Internet:
      • 16mb broadband
    iirc my 2500 @2.3ghz, 1gb 3200, 9700pro (with a little oc) gets 16000 max in 3dmark 2001 so ram and cpu speed (fsb) is whats limiting your score.

    StormPC is right about the later benchmarks, they are much more gfx card dependant.

    Imho benchmarking is fine for testing a new system and tweaking (or for bragging rights) but it's not the be all and end all. If your pc does what you want it to, when you want it to, then just sit back and enjoy
    "Reality is what it is, not what you want it to be." Frank Zappa. ----------- "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." Huang Po.----------- "A drowsy line of wasted time bathes my open mind", - Ride.

  10. #10
    Senior Member theslasher@ntlw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    389
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Cool

    Thank you iam at peace now i can play the mighty half life 2 at max settings is there such a sexy thing.

  11. #11
    Banned Smokey21's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Stafford, Midlands
    Posts
    1,752
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Hhehe congrats on the new purchase.

  12. #12
    Banned StormPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,194
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by theslasher@ntlw
    Thank you iam at peace now i can play the mighty half life 2 at max settings is there such a sexy thing.
    The X800XL is a great card. Here's what you can do with a 3700+ San Diego. Everything is stock cooling and volts.

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8596406

  13. #13
    Banned Smokey21's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Stafford, Midlands
    Posts
    1,752
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by StormPC
    The X800XL is a great card. Here's what you can do with a 3700+ San Diego. Everything is stock cooling and volts.

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8596406
    Indeed, but come on, 3dmark 2001 has about as much relevance as flying badgers, than it has with game performance.

  14. #14
    Banned StormPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,194
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey21
    Indeed, but come on, 3dmark 2001 has about as much relevance as flying badgers, than it has with game performance.
    Maybe, but you may want to read the title of this thread Smokester.

    He asked about 3DMark2001, not games. I just through the games comment in there because it is true and he later spoke of games.

  15. #15
    Banned Smokey21's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Stafford, Midlands
    Posts
    1,752
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Yeah i know, just saying. I mean 01 is so old, it's not really got much relevance, hell you can score 1000 points just having 1Mb L2, instead of 512k.

    You can get 30k, with that system, my 4400+ and X1800XT only get around 34k. Then if you compared 03 or 05, it would be a massacre.

  16. #16
    Banned StormPC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,194
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Yes, in the same way that the X800 series only beats the 9X00 series slightly in 2k1, so the X1800 series beats the X800. This does not mean that 2k1 is no longer relevant. It is a very good overall measure of raw system horsepower if you understand how to interpret the scores. 2k3 and 2k5 are mainly DX9 benchmarks. CPU matters on some tests but nowhere near as much as it does on 2k1. All the newest games are DX9. For DX8.1 and older games (there are many more of those than there are DX9) 2k1 is a more realistic benchmark.

    We are not really talking about 2k1's validity here, just the reasons for the discrepancy in the scores of the X800XL in 2k1, 2k3 and 2k5.
    Last edited by StormPC; 29-12-2005 at 05:03 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •