Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 24

Thread: X1950XTX and Mastercards... GDDR4 IS HERE!!

  1. #1
    Senior Member sawyen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sheffield University
    Posts
    3,658
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    22 times in 21 posts
    • sawyen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Laptop motherboard
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 740QM
      • Memory:
      • 8192MB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 256GB SSD, 1TB WD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD Mobility HD 5870
      • PSU:
      • MSI stuff
      • Case:
      • N/A
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64bit
      • Internet:
      • Virgin ADSL rubbish

    X1950XTX and Mastercards... GDDR4 IS HERE!!

    DailyTech's news.. ATI are beginning to sample the R580s on GDDR4 in early August dubbed X1950s..

    These will replace the X1900s as the flagship cards soon..

    Clockspeed has not been confirmed, but memory should have headroom of hitting 1.6Ghz (3.2Ghz DDR)..

    Will this have enough gas to even out with GX2?

    For some reason, I really think not...

    Side Note: X1900XT has been stripped down to and included a (ala X1800XT 256MB) X1900XT 256MB that should launch in under USD300.. should be a fun buy.. They've left all configuration similar (like the X1800XT) just with 50% of the mem stripped off..
    Me want Ultrabook


  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    WI, USA
    Posts
    293
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    4 times in 3 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sawyen
    Will this have enough gas to even out with GX2?

    For some reason, I really think not...
    You think right - X1900 refresh is no competition to the GX2.

    The HSF is good news to all with working ears though.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    147
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I doubt this will be worth buying if you already have a decent card. The refresh versions of cards usually arnt worth buying.

    Besides G80 and DX10 are coming out at the end of the year. Most people would be much better off waiting for them.

  4. #4
    Senior Member sawyen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sheffield University
    Posts
    3,658
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    22 times in 21 posts
    • sawyen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Laptop motherboard
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 740QM
      • Memory:
      • 8192MB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 256GB SSD, 1TB WD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD Mobility HD 5870
      • PSU:
      • MSI stuff
      • Case:
      • N/A
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64bit
      • Internet:
      • Virgin ADSL rubbish
    But I do feel its a good measure of how much better GDDR4 compared to GDDR3 in terms of outright real world speed.

    A comparison on similar core clocked X1900XT with an X1950XT should be fairly interesting..
    Me want Ultrabook


  5. #5
    Blue Army Member spazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sonning, Reading, Berks
    Posts
    1,939
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    10 times in 9 posts
    • spazman's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte DS3
      • CPU:
      • Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 2GB Corsair PC6400
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 320gb RAID 0 , 250gb IDE , 160gb IDE, 400bg USB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 7900GX2
      • PSU:
      • 750watt Enermax
      • Case:
      • Akasa Eclipse
      • Monitor(s):
      • 19" LCD 19" CRT
      • Internet:
      • Be Unlimited
    Quote Originally Posted by sawyen
    But I do feel its a good measure of how much better GDDR4 compared to GDDR3 in terms of outright real world speed.

    A comparison on similar core clocked X1900XT with an X1950XT should be fairly interesting..
    I doubt at the same speeds it will be faster, just take a look at DDR v DDR2. I think it's potencial to go faster than GDDR3 would have been the driving force behind the change.
    NES, SNES, N64, GameCube, Wii, GBA, DS, PSone, PS2, PSP, PS3 60gb, XBOX, XBOX 360, Master System, Game Gear, Mega Drive, Saturn, Dreamcast, PC Engine, Neo Geo CD

  6. #6
    Senior Member sawyen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sheffield University
    Posts
    3,658
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    22 times in 21 posts
    • sawyen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Laptop motherboard
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 740QM
      • Memory:
      • 8192MB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 256GB SSD, 1TB WD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD Mobility HD 5870
      • PSU:
      • MSI stuff
      • Case:
      • N/A
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64bit
      • Internet:
      • Virgin ADSL rubbish
    I meant just leaving the core clock the same i.e. 650MHz.. while leaving the mem speed to duke it out.. say the default X1900XTX 1650MHz GDDR3 versus an X1950XTX 3000MHz GDDR4..
    Me want Ultrabook


  7. #7
    Banned Smokey21's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Stafford, Midlands
    Posts
    1,752
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by spazman
    I doubt at the same speeds it will be faster, just take a look at DDR v DDR2. I think it's potencial to go faster than GDDR3 would have been the driving force behind the change.
    He said same core speeds. I doubt the X1950 will have anything higher than 650 anyways, maybe 675 at a stretch. Expect the memory to be 2Ghz. GDDR4 can scale to 3.2ghz.

    It's pretty obvious ATi are just giving a new cooler a spin, in time for R600. R600 is gonna be the biggest, hottest running chip ever, said so themselves, as well as the new memory.

    Article: http://www.dailytech.com/Article.aspx?newsid=3446

  8. #8
    Banned Smokey21's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Stafford, Midlands
    Posts
    1,752
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Also who even cares about the GX2? Seriously it's a pretty horrible idea. Your paying for 48 pipes and 1GB memory, but you don't get that being used. I hope we don't start going down that route in the future.

    Not to menton nvidia's aweful forceware drivers. It's not a single card anyways.

  9. #9
    Senior Member ExceededGoku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Lincolnshire, UK
    Posts
    1,578
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    no its 2 x 512mb not 1gb...
    Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz (400Mhzx8) 1.52V (set in bios, 1.47v real) | 4GB GeIL PC6400 4-4-4-12 | Gigabyte DQ6 @ 1600Mhz | HD2900XT 1GB | Enermax Infiniti 720W | Silverstone TJ07-B with custom watercooling | BenQ FP241WZ
    3dmark05 - 13140 | 3dmark06 - 6698 | SuperPi 1M - 15s

  10. #10
    Banned Smokey21's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Stafford, Midlands
    Posts
    1,752
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ExceededGoku
    no its 2 x 512mb not 1gb...
    Indeed it is. Re-read.

  11. #11
    Senior Member ExceededGoku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Lincolnshire, UK
    Posts
    1,578
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    yes, but you said it as 1GB initially, so I merely said what I said to inform others .
    Anyway I think this card will be awesome at high rez and with AA/AF on, performance loss with high settings will be even smaller .
    Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz (400Mhzx8) 1.52V (set in bios, 1.47v real) | 4GB GeIL PC6400 4-4-4-12 | Gigabyte DQ6 @ 1600Mhz | HD2900XT 1GB | Enermax Infiniti 720W | Silverstone TJ07-B with custom watercooling | BenQ FP241WZ
    3dmark05 - 13140 | 3dmark06 - 6698 | SuperPi 1M - 15s

  12. #12
    Banned Smokey21's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Stafford, Midlands
    Posts
    1,752
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ExceededGoku
    yes, but you said it as 1GB initially, so I merely said what I said to inform others .
    Anyway I think this card will be awesome at high rez and with AA/AF on, performance loss with high settings will be even smaller .
    I said your paying for 1Gb which you obviously are, but you don't use 1GB.

    And yes it should, with the extra bandwith. 2Ghz seems a little slow though i was expecting around 2.2Ghz.

  13. #13
    not posting kempez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Basingstoke
    Posts
    3,204
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    I am very much looking forward to taking a look at one of these babies
    Check my project <<| Black3D |>>
    Quote Originally Posted by hexah
    Games are developed by teams of talented people and sometimes electronic arts

  14. #14
    Senior Member ExceededGoku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Lincolnshire, UK
    Posts
    1,578
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    ye 2.2Ghz doesn't seem worth it, 3 Ghz at least
    Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz (400Mhzx8) 1.52V (set in bios, 1.47v real) | 4GB GeIL PC6400 4-4-4-12 | Gigabyte DQ6 @ 1600Mhz | HD2900XT 1GB | Enermax Infiniti 720W | Silverstone TJ07-B with custom watercooling | BenQ FP241WZ
    3dmark05 - 13140 | 3dmark06 - 6698 | SuperPi 1M - 15s

  15. #15
    Efficiency freak Queelis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Vilnius, Lithuania
    Posts
    857
    Thanks
    134
    Thanked
    78 times in 72 posts
    • Queelis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450 Tomahawk MAX
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4 32 GB 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • Adata XPG SX8200 PRO 512 GB, Toshiba E300 3TB, WD Green 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Palit Geforce RTX 2060 Super
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet PurePower 10 600W
      • Case:
      • be quiet! Silent Base 601
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell P2414H
      • Internet:
      • Gbit
    Still it's quite a bump for the memory, thus it should pack a punch. Will be interesting to read the reviews

  16. #16
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    30,757
    Thanks
    1,789
    Thanked
    3,289 times in 2,647 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish
    Presumably the refresh will also be for manufacturing efficiency reasons - we could get a cheaper and maybe less power hungry card as a result. Always a good thing.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •