Re: Which one to believe??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
picard
Hi,
Now today I have read about a useful tool,CoreTemp 0.95, so I d/loaded and ran it. It shows the temp from each core as 62C,61C,58C,61C.
Now,as there is a 50% difference in the 2 figures I would love someone to explain why and hopefully say the Asus figure is the right one.
It's not a 50% difference, as celcius is not an absolute scale. It's a difference of about 312-333 kelvin. So about 4%.
Sometimes the bios doesn't detect temps properly, so check if there is an update available. Apart from that, be cautious and assume it is running about 60C.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
picard
Hi,
Also I installed 4 x 1gig Crucial Ballistix 1066 memory sticks before I found out they would not be recognized (bright,eh?).I am running XP Pro and,although the mobo detects 4 gig XP says only 3.25gig is being used.Is there no way round this and,if not,will the current config stop the dual-channel working effectively?.
Thank you for any help.
XP-pro is 32bit, so is limited to 4 gig total addressable. Due to complicated technical reasons, XP-pro can only see about 3.2gig. Other than upgrading to xp-64 (or vista-64) there's nothing you can do. Dual channel should still work fine though.
Re: Which one to believe??
For temperatures, SpeedFan is generally reliable, though it still gives 1 erroneously high reading on my 6600.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
picard
I am running XP Pro and,although the mobo detects 4 gig XP says only 3.25gig is being used.
I've lost track of the number of times this has been discussed here. Do a search and you'll find a comprehensive answer.
Quote:
Is there no way round this
Change to a 64-bit version of Windows.
Quote:
and,if not,will the current config stop the dual-channel working effectively?.
No.
Re: Which one to believe??