I use TTA and convert to MP3 (~224 VBR) when I need the song on portable player.
I use TTA and convert to MP3 (~224 VBR) when I need the song on portable player.
Workstation 1: Intel i7 950 @ 3.8Ghz / X58 / 12GB DDR3-1600 / HD4870 512MB / Antec P180
Workstation 2: Intel C2Q Q9550 @ 3.6Ghz / X38 / 4GB DDR2-800 / 8400GS 512MB / Open Air
Workstation 3: Intel Xeon X3350 @ 3.2Ghz / P35 / 4GB DDR2-800 / HD4770 512MB / Shuttle SP35P2
HTPC: AMD Athlon X4 620 @ 2.6Ghz / 780G / 4GB DDR2-1000 / Antec Mini P180 White
Mobile Workstation: Intel C2D T8300 @ 2.4Ghz / GM965 / 3GB DDR2-667 / DELL Inspiron 1525 / 6+6+9 Cell Battery
Display (Monitor): DELL Ultrasharp 2709W + DELL Ultrasharp 2001FP
Display (Projector): Epson TW-3500 1080p
Speakers: Creative Megaworks THX550 5.1
Headphones: Etymotic hf2 / Ultimate Ears Triple.fi 10 Pro
Storage: 8x2TB Hitachi @ DELL PERC 6/i RAID6 / 13TB Non-RAID Across 12 HDDs
Consoles: PS3 Slim 120GB / Xbox 360 Arcade 20GB / PS2
I use a proggy called CDex. It's quite old now but is easy to use. I use it to rip to Lame MP3 using VBR with a minumum of 224Kbs and max of 320kbs with good effect.
CDex can also be configured to use different encoders if you wish.
An Atlantean Triumvirate, Ghosts of the Past, The Centre Cannot Hold
The Pillars of Britain, Foundations of the Reich, Cracks in the Pillars.
My books are available here for Amazon Kindle. Feedback always welcome!
I agree entirely, however, .ogg support isn't going to get any better unless more people use it, so I'd say rip to .ogg, find a decent mp3 player that supports it if you're bothered about portability (hello iAudio, and yes, look, it plays flac as well) and be damned.
So, yeah, if, like me, you haven't the room for lossless formats, vorbis is the way forward.
The -Vx switches offer better fine-tuning of quality according to need.
LAME Knowledgebase
EAC to vbr0 (the best vbr it'll do). I don't know about minute per MB, but this is certainly good enough for my ears...and relatively low std of pc sound equipment.
That said, I accept anything over 192cbr
I'll give that Vx switch a go too, charleski
cheers guys a nooby question: but will ripping these using summin like EAC put them in the handy artist/album/track tree format that WMP does? If not how do I emulate this - laziest options first please!
Open EAC Options from the EAC menu. Go to the Filename tab. Enter %A\%C\%N - %T in the Naming Scheme box (you can change the %N - %T to whatever track filename you prefer).
Oh, and set the root folder for your music collection in the Directories tab. It will then automatically save the files in the correct location.
Mp3 at 320kbps is definately the way to go. Maximum quality from the most well supported format
If you want to digitise your music collection for posterity and archive it and space isn't an issue, I'd use FLAC which is lossless. WMA lossless I think isn't as good (I've never used it because I don't like using a proprietary format). You can always transcode it at a later date to some more compressed format, whether MP3, ogg, wma, whatever for your portable mp3 player.
CD rippers such as EAC and CDex work very well and as others have mentioned, you can set up the directory naming system and automatically fill in the ID3 tags using CDDB.
I rather like WMA but i'd better explain why as it'a a 'microsoft' thing and all microsoft things are bad, right?
Quality (lossless, compressed):
1. OGG
2. AAC
3. WMA
4. MP3
One should note, it's a big gap from 3->4 tho.
So why WMA? Well it works on my PC, on my car's headunit (quite common in fact), on my portable player and DRM is optional. It _is_ without a doubt far better quality than MP3 in my experience and I can get away with smaller files to boot.
I've a lot of love for OGG but it's just not got support and AAC is irrelevant to me - which leaves WMA as a good choice for a quality format without the bulk of MP3.
Personally, I think people get a bit too hung-up over lossless. I've done a few ABX tests with the equipment I actually use for listening to music and found the differences between the original and the various lossy formats to be non-existant once you get over a bitrate of 190kbps or so. Various tests by other people do indicate that OGG is superior to mp3, but player support for it is very spotty once you get it off the PC. VBR mp3s at a decent bitrate are fine unless you're using a high-quality system which has been precisely set up.
If you're worried about archiving, the original pressed CD has more longevity than any HD or DVDR copy anyway, so you might as well just rip it to the format you're actually going to use.
Personally, I ripped my CD collection to FLAC, but I'm a bit anal like that. I like the idea that I'm listening to the original music, and I have a good (enough) audio system (using Slimserver/SqueezeBox) to tell the difference. I also like having a bit-accurate rip of the CDs, so that I can re-rip them to other formats. So I also have my CDs ripped to MP3 (at 112k high quality) for use on mine and my wife's mp3 players (useful for running, you can't hear the quality difference...much).
I bought a second hard disk - 200Gb cost about 40 quid.
Still, the thing to do is rip a few CD tracks of different styles to MP3, OGG, and FLAC, and take a listen. If you can't tell the difference, and it doesn't bother you, it doesn't matter! As I understand it, OGG is better at supporting gap-less playback, so that might be a factor in your decision.
As for ripping, I use dbPowerAmp (www.dbpoweramp.com). Its the dogs knackers I reckon. Easier to configure and use than EAC.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)