Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: PS3 passes the Petaflop line in Folding

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    PS3 passes the Petaflop line in Folding

    Sony's PlayStation3 is proving to be the ultimate folding machine as it passes the Petaflop barrier in Folding, the distributed computing scheme from Stanford University.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,457
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked
    75 times in 71 posts

    Re: PS3 passes the Petaflop line in Folding

    That is impressive. I wonder how much follding would have been done if there was a decent PS3 game?

  3. #3
    Comfortably Numb directhex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    /dev/urandom
    Posts
    17,074
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked
    1,027 times in 678 posts
    • directhex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus ROG Strix B550-I Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 5900x
      • Memory:
      • 64GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Seagate Firecuda 520
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNOVA 850W G3
      • Case:
      • NZXT H210i
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu 20.04, Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 34GN850
      • Internet:
      • FIOS

    Re: PS3 passes the Petaflop line in Folding

    what surprises me is folding not using double-precision floating point arithmetic, which is the bare minimum in computational science - cell's double precision performance is over 10x slower than its single precision performance

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    123
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: PS3 passes the Petaflop line in Folding

    Taking TFLOPs/number of CPUs as a kind of measure of how quick these things are, PS3s wipe the floor with general purpose CPUs. It's interesting to note though, that by this metric, GPUs are indeed better, but there's less of em. Do GPUs only take certain work unit types too? (does anyone know?)

    Following on, on the point that PS3's can only do one type of work unit, does anyone know how CPUs compare to the PS3 on those work units? is it still such a whitewash?

  5. #5
    Senior Member Andrzej's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    621
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    4 times in 3 posts

    Re: PS3 passes the Petaflop line in Folding

    Quote Originally Posted by jamiecockrill View Post
    ...Do GPUs only take certain work unit types too?...
    My understanding is that they take (pretty much) most work units - but that their unique parallelism only allows them to excel with certain units

    Could be wrong - but I believe this is the case
    .
    .

    I kept 6 trusted serving men, they taught me all I knew.
    There names were what and where and why and how and when and who.


    (I also had the HEXUS forums on speed dial just in case )

  6. #6
    The LHC rulez! DataMatrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    511
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked
    10 times in 10 posts

    Re: PS3 passes the Petaflop line in Folding

    This doesn't impress me whatsoever.

    Average TFLOPS per processor
    GPU average: 0.0595
    PS3 average: 0.0247

    If there were more GPUs folding, they would crush the PS3 by producing over twice as much processing power.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    123
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: PS3 passes the Petaflop line in Folding

    And, more pointedly, GPUs would crush the PS3 on the basis that it can munch through more types of work unit. I guess the next question is, why are there so few graphics cards that support folding? The PS3 should be applauded for doing its bit as well, even if it's only one type of work unit, it must be a pretty amazing contribution! I'd love my 360 to be able to do the same.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. nero recode compiling volume failed
    By hvb in forum Welcome to HEXUS!
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-09-2007, 10:14 AM
  2. Problem with Nero
    By deathsith in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 15-06-2007, 09:24 AM
  3. Wii \ PS3 \ 360 Opinions.
    By Stewart in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 30-11-2006, 03:34 PM
  4. Max Rules
    By Trippledence in forum Networking and Broadband
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-04-2006, 04:57 PM
  5. Nero vision express saying:'Burn process failed'
    By johnnr892 in forum Help! Quick Relief From Tech Headaches
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-12-2005, 11:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •