Read more.There's no doubt that John Byrne is right, but the question is: how much of a dent and for how long?
Read more.There's no doubt that John Byrne is right, but the question is: how much of a dent and for how long?
Last edited by Scott B; 30-06-2008 at 03:28 PM.
The 38xx/48xx ranges have put AMD back in the game. They appear to have learnt some valuable lessons from the underwhelming 2900. AMD have relatively high temps and power consumption, but they are far more competitive on price. Nvidia may be heading into harder times!
Last edited by =TcQi=; 30-06-2008 at 06:26 PM. Reason: TooNice's point
The 38xx reminds me of the 8500, whereas the 48xx reminds me of the 9700 Pro. The 38xx put AMD back on the map after a less than stellar predecessor just as the 8500 did for ATI after the less than amazing Fury MAXX. However, I consider both the 38xx and the 8500 to have shown a lot of promise, but neither were decisive winners in their generation. Okay, I may be a bit harsh on the 38xx, as it was far better on release than the 8500, but nevertheless, it's greatest strength was the multimedia capability more than anything else. From a bang4buck and absolute performance perspective, they did not have much over the 9600GT/8800GT. And I remember that despite the smaller fabrication process, the 38xx did not win in terms of performance per watt other the nVidia offerings.
The 48xx on the other hand is almost ideal for most. Technically, it's not really comparable to the 9700 Pro in the sense that it's not the indisputable performance leader, but it's got most things right (notably, outstanding bang4buck on the upper end). To be fair, I wouldn't give it to them in terms of power consumption. The idle power consumption is too high, and the gap between the 4870 and the 280GTX on idle is greater than the gap under load.
Well, considering that they have released a range of CPUs as well recently.....which have bombed, plus the 4870s seem to be dropping like flies (according to user feedback), I am not so sure that they are as happy as they make out.
And as the article states, AMD have to keep up the pressure, else its all for nothing. We aren't going to know for quite some time whether they can keep it up or not.
I just hope they can keep up the pressure (and sort their CPUs out) as it only benefits the customer.
To be fair to nVidia though, they pushed the Geforce 8 series at very good prices considering they had virtually zero competition.
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Most (if not all) of these reports have been attributed to people flashing their cards with an incorrectly sized BIOS. Re-flashing with the correct BIOS resurrects the flies.
http://www.dvhardware.net/article28266.html
I agree. A little knowledge...
If only AMD brought the tri-cores to the £60-£70 boundary then they would also give Intel a smacking.![]()
Cavalier-X: Biostar TP45-HP ¦ E4600@3.1ghz - Xigmatek Red Scorpion (OCZ Freeze) ¦ OCZ ReaperX 2x2gb (792mhz @ 4-4-4--12) ¦ Xigmatek NRP-MC651 ¦
Palit 8800gt ¦ X-fi Fatal1ty Gamer ¦ Coolermaster Cavalier 3 (Silver/Windowed) ¦
Poseidon Magma: MSI P45 Zilent ¦ E6300@3.0ghz - Coolermaster Hyper 212 (MX-2) ¦ Corsair 2x2gb (880mhz @ 5-5-5-15) ¦ Corsair HX450w ¦
xfx 9600gt Alphadog edition (780/1950/1000) ¦ X-fi Gamer ¦ Gigabyte Poseiden ¦
Dig around all the usual forums, plenty of people saying they have done nothing and the cards are dead.
Others have flashed and killed them (their fault, although resurrectable it seems)
And you have to ask the question "Why are they flashing them?"........
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Perhaps because the early adopters of said cards are often enthusiasts, who are typically interested in extracting the maximum performance possible (even at the expense of the warrantee)....
Care to provide least one article/post that details more than three failures that are not attributable to user error? I've done a little digging and all I could find was a couple of cards that were dead on arrival....
Edit: If you are refferring to http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ight=4870+dead in particular, then I suggest you read the posts towards the end of the thread
Last edited by =TcQi=; 01-07-2008 at 12:32 PM.
Just head over to xtremesystems, plenty of threads there.
No one is going to know for sure for at least a few weeks whether the reports are true or whether its people lying (after messing with the cards).
The bottom line either way though is that a brand new card shouldn't need to be flashed to get the fan working properly. I know I do not feel confident buying one right now. If you do, more power to you.
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)