Read more.Insists NETBOOK is still an active trademark and wants damages from Intel for its use of it.
Read more.Insists NETBOOK is still an active trademark and wants damages from Intel for its use of it.
There is nothing more than meets the eye here - indeed justice may be best served by giving Intel a slap on the wrist and invalidating the trademark.Court documents dated 27 February 2009 obtained by a website called savethenetbooks.com, which appears to be an independent blog campaigning against Psion's ownership of the NETBOOK trademark, show that Psion is suing Intel for the damages caused it by Intel's use of the term.
Our primary concern is protecting consumer choice, and while many such organisations (especially in the IT industry) have sponsor-driven goals we have no such affiliations.
StN
Nice for a change that unlike the ars technica article, savethenetbooks.com did actually get mentioned as the news source for the court documents.
However I can't say I follow the argument that Psion are in the wrong. Intel knowingly and intentionally used and subsequently spread a trademark for which they did not have the right to use. If Psion don't see any money coming there way, and a court ruling in there favour I'd be surprised. Intel should have, and quite easily could have, approached Psion in the first place to buy the trademark in my opinion, or could have simply used something else!
Last edited by digit; 02-03-2009 at 11:42 AM.
Psion are just trying to get some capital because they are completely screwed. Aright they have a case but why the hell bother.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)