Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: News - AMD thinks its latest CPU launch surprised Intel

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    News - AMD thinks its latest CPU launch surprised Intel

    UK boss of AMD says the Phenom II X4 955 is being positioned against the Core i7 920, but costs less.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member sawyen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sheffield University
    Posts
    3,658
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    22 times in 21 posts
    • sawyen's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Laptop motherboard
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 740QM
      • Memory:
      • 8192MB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 256GB SSD, 1TB WD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD Mobility HD 5870
      • PSU:
      • MSI stuff
      • Case:
      • N/A
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64bit
      • Internet:
      • Virgin ADSL rubbish

    Re: News - AMD thinks its latest CPU launch surprised Intel

    Nope.. don't think it did really..

    955 wasn't all that suprising..

    But I have to say the 720 BE is probably the most significant shock to intel as it instantaneously renders all their Core 2 Duo chips obsolete..

    Honest..
    Me want Ultrabook


  3. #3
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    83
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    10 times in 10 posts
    • tonpal's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M3A78-T
      • CPU:
      • AMD Athlon II x2 240
      • Memory:
      • Corsair DDR2 800MHz
      • Storage:
      • 64GB Crucial C300, 250GB Maxtor and 160GB WD Caviar Blue
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Powercolor HD3870
      • PSU:
      • Enermax Pro82+ 385W
      • Case:
      • Hiper Osiris
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell E172FP and Dell U2312HM
      • Internet:
      • Eclipse ADSL2+

    Re: News - AMD thinks its latest CPU launch surprised Intel

    Andrew Buxton needs to look at some benchmarks. The X4 955 competes well against Core 2 and hopefully will compete as well against Core i5. The entry of the Phenom II range has introduced competiton at the mainstream quad level and has been a great benefit to consumers.

    To claim it is competitive against Core i7 sets unrealistic expectations which do not do AMD any favours.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    508
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked
    18 times in 17 posts

    Re: News - AMD thinks its latest CPU launch surprised Intel

    Realistically Intel still beats AMD with the i7 v X4 955 but unfortunately for Intel once you factor in the £150 minimum price of a motherboard to go with this chip then it doesn't stack up so well, add in the uncertainty on Intels socket types (at the moment) and the AMD might look a better, cheaper and far safer option ...

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Grimsby
    Posts
    459
    Thanks
    121
    Thanked
    75 times in 43 posts
    • Nelly.'s system
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 7600
      • Memory:
      • Kingston 2x16GB 5600C36
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 980 Pro 2TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX 750 PSU
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define S
      • Operating System:
      • Win 11 Pro / Linux
      • Monitor(s):
      • NEC 24WMGX3 24" TFT
      • Internet:
      • 70GB Broadband

    Re: News - AMD thinks its latest CPU launch surprised Intel

    Crysis review on http://www.***********.net/reviews.p...raphics_card/4
    CPU: Intel Nehalem i7 920 Skt1366 2.66GHz (@3.835 Ghz)
    Motherboard: DFI X58 UT T3eH8
    Memory: 3x2GB Corsair DDR3 1600mhz @ 8-8-8-24
    HD : Hitachi Deskstar 7k160 7200rpm 80GB
    GPU: XFX GTX295
    Graphics Drivers: GeForce 181.22
    PSU: Gigabyte ODIN 1200w

    Crysis Benchmark I ran using my rig, this is using a 24" TFT at 1920x1080 / AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition @ 3.6ghz stock volts.

    Using AA loses 2fps, I've redone the test @ 3.8ghz with AA on for 58fps.

    54.4 FPS


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-05-2009, 03:18 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 23-03-2009, 01:36 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-07-2008, 11:33 AM
  4. Scan & Intel CPU Warranty Issues
    By Supershanks in forum SCAN.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 05-02-2008, 12:15 PM
  5. Do you get an 'XP rating' applied when you o/c?
    By Austin in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 11-12-2003, 03:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •