Read more.Psystar seeks Chapter 11 protection while legal action from Apple is still underway.
Read more.Psystar seeks Chapter 11 protection while legal action from Apple is still underway.
Chapter 11 sounds interesting - protection from the people who you are being prosecuted by, while you continue to do what they're prosecuting you for... could be a case of precedence, and I would expect Apple to throw armies of lawyers at it.
Top marks for being seriously cheeky though!
He doesn't deserve the credit IMO.
While I do not agree with Apples stance on OSX (and even run it *unmodified* on my own PC occasionally), making a profit from it seems wrong, especially when Psystar were not selling retail boxes with their PCs (this may have changed now with the lawsuit)....
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
I have sympathy for Psystar. Not in the way they have goen about it but I can't understand why Microsoft gets record fines for bundling IE with Windows yet Apple act in a more protentionist and monopolistic way yet it seems they are entirely allowed to do so. I'm 100% certain there will be legal stance on why they can but I just don't understand it.
If someone in the know wanted to explain it to me then I'd be deighted to understand why.
It's a hard one to call, I'm in two minds on what I take from this story (as to whether I agree with Apple/Psystar) but ultimately it's Apple's prerogative.
Is it just down to sales ..or does it also come down to their support? Like them not wanting to start supporting their OS on hardware unbeknown to them?
The thing is Psystar broke the terms of Apple's EULA and as such deserve to go out of business.
The way Apple makes its money is through hardware sales, the OS is just a way to entice people into buying the hardware. So bundling the OS on non Mac hardware is going to harm Apple's business as they make very little off of OS sales.
Psystar also aren’t selling OSX compatible PCs they are selling PCs with a hacked version of OSX installed, the hardware may be similar but the implementation is backwards. If they truly were selling an OSX compatible machines then I should be able to use my retail purchased copy of OSX and install it with out any problems, in this case I cant I would need a copy that has been hacked to boot from a standard PC. The other thing that should be available is the ability to use software updates without fear of it breaking my system another thing these can't do.
They also have the potential to harm Apple's reputation with the less computer literate people. If some one buys one of these with out understanding what they are buying when it goes wrong they will blame Apple, and assume that OSX is rubbish and buggy, and when they go to Apple to be told they can't help they will assume Apple's customer care is rubbish, driving potential customers away.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)