Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: News - Intel Clarkdale 32nm CPU-and-GPU chip benchmarked (again)

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    News - Intel Clarkdale 32nm CPU-and-GPU chip benchmarked (again)

    Intel spills the beans on performance of its next-generation CPU/GPU chip known as Clarkdale.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    195
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked
    31 times in 28 posts

    Re: News - Intel Clarkdale 32nm CPU-and-GPU chip benchmarked (again)

    Clarkdale paired with the Intel H57 mini-ITX board is looking to be a good combination, with the cpu having decent power consumption and the IGP on par with the 785G.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    South East
    Posts
    860
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    8 times in 7 posts

    Re: News - Intel Clarkdale 32nm CPU-and-GPU chip benchmarked (again)

    Any ideas on costs and if the system drew 20W in idle and 60W load then whats the TDP of the chip.. got to be this side of bugger all

  4. #4
    King of the Juice Platinum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Chesterfield
    Posts
    3,769
    Thanks
    713
    Thanked
    89 times in 74 posts
    • Platinum's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X99 Deluxue
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 5930k @ 4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 32gb Crucial 2400MHz
      • Storage:
      • 256gb Samsung SP941, 1tb MX500 Crucial SSD, 240gb Intel 730 SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 Fury OC
      • PSU:
      • 750 Watt Corsair HX
      • Case:
      • Corsiar 750D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2408WFP
      • Internet:
      • 18Mb

    Re: News - Intel Clarkdale 32nm CPU-and-GPU chip benchmarked (again)

    mmm, that board, Clarkedale chip, SG05 and a GTS250 and I have the perfect lan machine
    Salazaar : <Touching wood as I write this...>


  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    195
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked
    31 times in 28 posts

    Re: News - Intel Clarkdale 32nm CPU-and-GPU chip benchmarked (again)

    Quote Originally Posted by Methanoid View Post
    Any ideas on costs and if the system drew 20W in idle and 60W load then whats the TDP of the chip.. got to be this side of bugger all
    This is from an article from Xbit:


  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Castle Gresley
    Posts
    628
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked
    18 times in 18 posts
    • marshalex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P6T bios 1303
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 12GB Kingston Hyper X DDR3 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840, WD Caviar Black 640Gb, WD Caviar Blue 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX Radeon HD 6950 XXX @915 MHz
      • PSU:
      • Antec TruePower New 650W
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster CM690
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell ST2210
      • Internet:
      • Sky Fibre 38MB

    Re: News - Intel Clarkdale 32nm CPU-and-GPU chip benchmarked (again)

    looking forward to seeing these when they come out. hopefully if priced right will make a fantastic HTPC for a reasonable price. just need blu-ray drives to drop that bit further and it will be a cracker

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    South East
    Posts
    860
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    8 times in 7 posts

    Re: News - Intel Clarkdale 32nm CPU-and-GPU chip benchmarked (again)

    Quote Originally Posted by simonw View Post
    This is from an article from Xbit:

    That kinda looks a tad different from claims of 60W loaded system when TDP is 73W for CPU/GPU alone.... maybe that TDP is rather generous.... if 60W is a real load system thats pretty good. My C2D integrated VGA system is loaded at 75W and thats pretty good IMHO.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    195
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked
    31 times in 28 posts

    Re: News - Intel Clarkdale 32nm CPU-and-GPU chip benchmarked (again)

    Quote Originally Posted by Methanoid View Post
    That kinda looks a tad different from claims of 60W loaded system when TDP is 73W for CPU/GPU alone.... maybe that TDP is rather generous.... if 60W is a real load system thats pretty good. My C2D integrated VGA system is loaded at 75W and thats pretty good IMHO.
    The results from the Hexus preview may be off a little. There are a few previews from other tech sites and they report it as 30W idle and 70W full load, and this is with evidence of those watt meters.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: News - Intel Clarkdale 32nm CPU-and-GPU chip benchmarked (again)

    It's nice to see that Nehalem chips albeit in their second iteration are going down in TDp. Probaby cause Intel need to sold out all those 45nm chips based on Penryn (just as they show i3 right agains c2q chips)

    But still even with 4 virtual threads in 2 core these chips came out at the 50% more price than old Athlon X4 chips capable of real 4 threads or almost twice the price of aii x3 that comes into functional egal with 50% max HT boost on Nehalem cores.

    And as far BluRay estimated consumption goes nobody seems to mention that 1080p on sse4a (or even sse4.1) chips is possible as low as 1500MHz w/o hitting max limits and new 45nm athlons can do that with chip hitting 20W max TDP w/o even need for external graphic support or so much amd praised uvd (that in fact hurt in more cases than help). So if we put some SS DC ddr2 (lot more consume than similar ddr3, but still under 5W as manufacturers claims in case when ds sc use also below claimed 5W) and with some of fully capable GreenHDD with 5-6W in read mode we see that 35W is viable for some old am2+ system based on chipset w/ integrated graphic, not necessary w/ PureVideo or UVD in fact players sholdn't be capable recognise that to go to that TDP and avoid overhyped GPU post processing.

  10. #10
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: News - Intel Clarkdale 32nm CPU-and-GPU chip benchmarked (again)

    Whether or not the IGP has the performance of the ATI and Nvidia ones in reality is another question and so is driver support for the IGP which has not been an Intel strong point in the past AFAIK.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. How points are calculated for F@H
    By Webby in forum Software
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 25-11-2009, 02:33 AM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 24-09-2009, 04:17 PM
  3. new HD x264 video encoding benchmark
    By graysky in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 05-10-2008, 09:28 PM
  4. Overclocking CPU and GFX results
    By Misklin in forum abit.care@HEXUS
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-01-2008, 12:49 AM
  5. Xbox 2 Initial Specs
    By PanzerKnight in forum Gaming
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 19-07-2004, 03:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •