Read more.Image format promises smaller files than JPEG while maintaining quality.
Read more.Image format promises smaller files than JPEG while maintaining quality.
Hm seems interesting, JPEG is already an extremely small size but I guess even smaller with the same quality is always better. I wonder if support for this will manage to make it into Firefox 4.1 (considering Beta 7 of FX 4 is the feature freeze there's not much hope of it before then) and IE9, that will probably be fairly critical in ensuring it's success or failure.
I would've thought improving lossless compression would be a higher priority - if that compression can approach the jpeg file size, it should begin to supercede it.
Smaller file sizes for same quality is always a bonus though.
am i missing something:
Image 1 = 42595 bytes
Image 2 = 566192 bytes
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)