Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 17

Thread: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,060 times in 719 posts

    News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    O2 and BT less than impressed with Virgin Media's bid to play consumer champion.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Shire of teh York
    Posts
    183
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    9 times in 7 posts
    • zoomee's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Rampage IV Formula
      • CPU:
      • 4960X@4.7/1.4v - 24/7@4.5/1.23v
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb Ripjaws Quad Channel 2400Mhz
      • Storage:
      • 250Gb 840 Pro, Samsung 2Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • AMD 290 - full w/c block
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX-860i
      • Case:
      • Corsair 750D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 29" LG 2560x1080
      • Internet:
      • 150MB Virgin

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    Maybe BT and O2 should start a www.stopthebroadbandcapping.com campaign?

    thats what made me leave virgin (along with they're stupidly high prices!) - The only 'con-ing' going on ere is them with their super sky high prices for 20MB+

    The other ISP's are capable of providing high speeds - just a shame the cabling / exchange issues hold them back.....

  3. #3
    Formerly known as Andehh Andeh13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    3,353
    Thanks
    855
    Thanked
    257 times in 152 posts
    • Andeh13's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-P35
      • CPU:
      • Intel Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 4gb Corsair XMS2 800mhz
      • Storage:
      • 1 x 250gb Western Digital AAKS, 2 x 500gb Western Digital AAKS, 1TB WD Caviar Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • BFG Geforce 8800GTS 512mb
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 24" & Sony 17"
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 10mb... hate them!

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    That is laughable. Virgin trying to be the crusader for the consumer! What an utter joke! All O2 need to say is, ''what's our customer satisfaction compared to yours Virgin Media?'' ...nothing else, that would stop VM in their tracks!

    That and those two words... traffic management!

  4. #4
    Senior Member usxhe190's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,688
    Thanks
    149
    Thanked
    82 times in 63 posts

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    This is all crap. Only stupid people will fall for it. Normal people will see through this crap for what it is.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    474
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    26 times in 26 posts
    • pipTheGeek's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P6T Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 920 @ 3.6GHz
      • Memory:
      • 3 * 2Gb Corsair XMS @ DDR3 1800
      • Storage:
      • 300GB 15K SAS + 500Gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX570
      • PSU:
      • corsair 760i
      • Case:
      • Corsair 550d
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell Alienware 23"
      • Internet:
      • VM 50Mb

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    Quote Originally Posted by usxhe190 View Post
    This is all crap. Only stupid people will fall for it. Normal people will see through this crap for what it is.
    In my experiance with Virgin we have always got the broadband speed that I have been paying for. I don't know a single person that gets the advertised up-to speed on ADSL.

    Also, I think you have too much faith in the general public.

    Number measures quality ==> bigger number, better. Buy the biggest number.

    We have seen a similar formula for digital cameras, and to a slightly lesser extent, power supplies.

    TBH I know that the headline speed is not the only thing I would need to look at if I was buying ADSL. Equally well, knowing an average speed for an ISP would be pretty pointless as well. So I don't care about this campaign. And have been quite frustrated by the irresponsible coverage that this campaign has recieved by some TV shows. (The Gadget show, I'm looking at you).

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Durham
    Posts
    307
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    21 times in 12 posts

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    Quote Originally Posted by pipTheGeek View Post
    In my experiance with Virgin we have always got the broadband speed that I have been paying for. I don't know a single person that gets the advertised up-to speed on ADSL.
    I wish i could say the same thing.

    My friend on Virgin atm has had nothing but bad experiences, ranging from broadband only being useable during certain times of the day (usually before 10am and after 12am) and currently, constant packet loss and very poor speeds.

    This is all despite promises that they were "looking into the issue" and that it would be "fixed" multiple times on different dates over the course of a month, all of which have improved the service slightly, but nowhere near what was expected.

    He's had discounts for the previous month or two, but money back isn't really a substitute for appalling service. Not to mention when he told them that he was considering leaving them for a new provider they told him that he was out of the contract cancellation period (although i'm pretty sure that since their promise of providing broadband never held up, i would have said he'd have a case... but meh).

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    291
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • Boon72's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z370 TOMAHAWK
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-8500 @ 3.0Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 2666Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung EVO 960 256gb NVMe, 2 x Toshiba 2TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX1060 AMP 6GB
      • PSU:
      • EVGA 500w
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake F31 Suppressor
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Home x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • iiyama Black Hawk 27"
      • Internet:
      • Vodafone Max Fibre

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    I used to have Virgin BB and had the nearly quoted speed, but with all the traffic shaping it didn't last long before being chopped down by 3/4... not much about that from them, i'd rather have the upto speed i have now with no shaping or limits than paying loads more for a fraction of the use.

  8. #8
    Insomnia Robscure's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    703
    Thanks
    108
    Thanked
    32 times in 24 posts

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    I had to take Virgin because that's all I had installed already and didn't want to pay fees for installation... It's not so bad tbh, I game during the day, my pings seem okay... could be better I guess but I have never in my life had an internet that was amazing, they're all the same, O2/Virgin, always had similar performance results... At least this downloads fast at all times...

    Their 100mb package should be interesting to see

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    474
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    26 times in 26 posts
    • pipTheGeek's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P6T Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 920 @ 3.6GHz
      • Memory:
      • 3 * 2Gb Corsair XMS @ DDR3 1800
      • Storage:
      • 300GB 15K SAS + 500Gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX570
      • PSU:
      • corsair 760i
      • Case:
      • Corsair 550d
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell Alienware 23"
      • Internet:
      • VM 50Mb

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    This seems a very common story, whenever VM is discussed. People either have no end of trouble with them and never get the speed you should, or you have no problems and get (nearly) the full speed.

    People mention their traffic shaping, but I can't say I have ever been very bothered by it. And I'm even less bothered by it now I'm on 50mb.

    A friend of mine moved house, from a cabled area to non-cabled and has swapped 20mb (actual 20mb, all the time) for Syk broadband managing about 3mb. He is not impressed with Sky and wishes he could still be a VM customer.

  10. #10
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    Quote Originally Posted by pipTheGeek View Post
    In my experiance with Virgin we have always got the broadband speed that I have been paying for. I don't know a single person that gets the advertised up-to speed on ADSL.
    Really? I didn't know that Virgin did a 48 Meg package!

    As for speed, I would rather have a 10meg circuit with low latency than a 20meg with high latency. I moved my parents from Virgin after a six week long fault impacted Derby. Even when it was fixed it still was very poor. The response times where appalling, and most modern website such as Google Maps that grab data in the background were simply unusable.

    Despite being offer a refund on the weeks affected and given a code to quote to the accounts department, my parents still never got the refund.

    Virgin Media network is a whoa of badly connected and manage pipes, with poor proxy servers, bad traffic shaping, bandwidth throttling, and bloody poor customer management. To even talk about there problem and network management is a contradiction in terms, as during the aforementioned six week problem you would call customer service to get an update on the incident only to be told that no incident existed and there was no issue with the connection in Derby. Strange when one of the two pipes that connect Derby to the Virgin network was working, and the other had issues as well.

    Parents, are well please with their "faster" line on BE, despite getting only 10 of the 24, it runs and responds so much "faster" than the 20 of Virgin Failure.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Kingdom of Fife (Scotland)
    Posts
    4,991
    Thanks
    393
    Thanked
    220 times in 190 posts
    • crossy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabertooth X99
      • CPU:
      • Intel 5830k / Noctua NH-D15
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 850Pro NVMe, 1TB Samsung 850EVO SSD, 1TB Seagate SSHD, 2TB WD Green, 8TB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix GTX970OC
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX750 (modular)
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster HAF932 (with wheels)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit, Ubuntu 16.04LTS
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG Flattron W2361V
      • Internet:
      • VirginMedia 200Mb

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    Quote Originally Posted by pipTheGeek View Post
    This seems a very common story, whenever VM is discussed. People either have no end of trouble with them and never get the speed you should, or you have no problems and get (nearly) the full speed.
    Couldn't agree more - heck, the comments on this article bear this out. Of which speaking, I'm going to nail my colours to the mast - I'm a long-time VM subscriber (had them when they were BlueYonder - miles better) and I telework, so I use my VM BB line at least 5 days per week for 8 hours or more. In all the time I've had them I've had only two days of outage. Although I was having terrible trouble with the speed about two years ago - sometimes it'd be full speed and then five minutes later you'd be down to 56k speeds. However, this stopped and I've no complaints - heck I run server connections back to the office and it's pretty acceptable - and I'm on the 10Mb service. Just downloaded three DVD ISO's overnight and it took just over three hours.

    On the other hand I have had arguments with both BT and Sky - "oh yes, sir we can sell you 20Mb service for slightly less than Vermin", you then point out that according to BT's broadband checker I'm blessed with "up to" 3Mb and so their deal isn't that good. Maybe Vermin have got a slight point - vendors need to be a bit more up front about the fact that it's up to whatever bluesky figure they quote.

    To be even handed though - BT also have a point - they serve a lot more of the country than VM do, so it's obvious that their country wide average is going to be lower. So, stop quoting this very misleading value!

    Interesting to see that VM seem to have problems delivering service to city centres - overcommited networks and lack of investment?

    Career status: still enjoying my new career in DevOps, but it's keeping me busy...

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Copenhagen, DK
    Posts
    1,893
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked
    100 times in 80 posts
    • Barrichello's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus VII Ranger
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7-4790 (3.60Ghz)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB
      • Storage:
      • 2 x (250GB) Samsung 840 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Geforce GTX 770 (DC2OC 2GB GDDR5)
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750HX
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define R4
      • Operating System:
      • Linux/Win 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • BenQ XL2720T
      • Internet:
      • 100MB/100MB

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    Quote Originally Posted by pipTheGeek View Post
    In my experiance with Virgin we have always got the broadband speed that I have been paying for. I don't know a single person that gets the advertised up-to speed on ADSL.
    Same here, i think Virgin have a point, and BT "hitting back" is laughable. My parents have one of these "upto 20mb" adsl services as they can not get cable, and their adsl speeds are terrible and nowhere near the advertised. At least with Virgin i get bang on/close to the speeds that are actually advertised, could never go back to adsl personally.

  13. #13
    Sublime HEXUS.net
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    The Void.. Floating
    Posts
    11,819
    Thanks
    213
    Thanked
    233 times in 160 posts
    • Stoo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Mac Pro
      • CPU:
      • 2*Xeon 5450 @ 2.8GHz, 12MB Cache
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 1600MHz FBDIMM
      • Storage:
      • ~ 2.5TB + 4TB external array
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI Radeon HD 4870
      • Case:
      • Mac Pro
      • Operating System:
      • OS X 10.7
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Samsung 244T Black
      • Internet:
      • Zen Max Pro

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    my case.. ADSL - "up to" 20meg - reality: 3.5mbit connected, actual: ~2.5mbit profile, however, I knew what I'd be getting beforehand..

    Harsh traffic management smacks of lack of capacity planning/poor investment.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,474
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    140 times in 116 posts
    • BobF64's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7-3770K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair XMS3 PC3-12800
      • Storage:
      • Multiple HDD and SSD drives
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS DUAL-GTX1060-06G
      • PSU:
      • 750W Silverstone Strider Gold Evolution
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT02
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP ZR24w

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    Quote Originally Posted by crossy View Post
    On the other hand I have had arguments with both BT and Sky - "oh yes, sir we can sell you 20Mb service for slightly less than Vermin", you then point out that according to BT's broadband checker I'm blessed with "up to" 3Mb and so their deal isn't that good. Maybe Vermin have got a slight point - vendors need to be a bit more up front about the fact that it's up to whatever bluesky figure they quote.
    Indeed, based on surveys and adverts that have been on TV where people whine about their speed, most people dont actually understand what "up to" means, nor do they understand why its "up to" and not a guaranteed speed thats the same for everyone.

    What ISPs should do really is have a rate for their top speed, and give a discount/refund for every 1Mbps that your line is under that.

    ie, they charge you £20 for 8Mbps, £10 for 4Mbps, £5 for 2Mbps and £2.50 for 1Mbps or less.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stoo View Post
    my case.. ADSL - "up to" 20meg - reality: 3.5mbit connected, actual: ~2.5mbit profile, however, I knew what I'd be getting beforehand..

    Harsh traffic management smacks of lack of capacity planning/poor investment.
    Sometimes, yes, when youre getting much less than the line is running at.

    Sometimes its just poor wiring, interference from something else or just pure distance from the exchange.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    In a barn, on a farm!
    Posts
    365
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked
    8 times in 7 posts

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    I live in a rural area, but Virgin have just put a cable down the road that i live on. I asked them whether we could get their service but as I live on a farm up a track about 1/2 mile from the road (as do 90% of the houses serviced by the road) they refused to even provide me with a line.

    They sent me flyers etc saying I could get connected to their service and then when I actually enquire they tell me they can't. I personally think Virgins selective roll out of service and then bleating on about BT smacks of misleading advertising!

    And although a fair few people who I know have moaned about both BT ADSL and Virgin services, once I've sat down and explained how ADSL works they understand the problem, can't really explain their problem on virgin as they shouldn't have any, it's superfast fibre optic afterall!

  16. #16
    Insomnia Robscure's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    703
    Thanks
    108
    Thanked
    32 times in 24 posts

    Re: News - ISPs hit back at Virgin's 'broadband con' positioning

    Quote Originally Posted by [GSV]Myocardial View Post
    I live in a rural area, but Virgin have just put a cable down the road that i live on. I asked them whether we could get their service but as I live on a farm up a track about 1/2 mile from the road (as do 90% of the houses serviced by the road) they refused to even provide me with a line.

    They sent me flyers etc saying I could get connected to their service and then when I actually enquire they tell me they can't. I personally think Virgins selective roll out of service and then bleating on about BT smacks of misleading advertising!

    And although a fair few people who I know have moaned about both BT ADSL and Virgin services, once I've sat down and explained how ADSL works they understand the problem, can't really explain their problem on virgin as they shouldn't have any, it's superfast fibre optic afterall!
    What do you expect from a company named "Virgin" and run by a playboy narcissist?


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. News - PS3 and PSP hit new milestones in U.K.
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-03-2009, 04:38 PM
  2. News - Storage companies take goodwill hit
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-02-2009, 12:07 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-12-2008, 02:41 AM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 29-11-2008, 02:44 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30-09-2008, 10:49 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •