Read more.Legal wrangling to stop circulation of pirated films and TV shows.
Read more.Legal wrangling to stop circulation of pirated films and TV shows.
Its a move to block access to a website called newzbin
That site just indexes the content of usenet.
The issue with the original site was that they had a team of editors classifying the reports generated from usenet into different categories ie Movies/DVD/Ironman. So there was a human element to aiding copyright infringment, not just computer generated reports. Well, that plus a crappy legal defense team.
The site does generate nzb files, which tell your usenet downloader where to find files in newsgroups, in the same way that you could write a batch script to download from an FTP.
Its a bit of a crappy news report for a tech site.
I was about to say that was a bit harsh, but then I read this:
Please tell me that's a typo and the writer does actually know what usenet is?!?Film industry big shots have urged BT to block access to an indexing website called Usenet, which acts as a hub for links to websites hosting pirated copies of films and TV shows.
It looks like there was a typo in that first paragraph, which I've now corrected.
Thanks for your feedback.
They should really go after usenet servers - it'd be an open and shut case surely ?
Amazed they haven't been targeted yet.
Usenet servers are actually storing and distributing pirated and illegal content.
Torrent sites (and newsbin) by contrast don't store any pirated files - just indexes
but a usenet server IS actually storing and distributing them - in an encrypted/obfuscated form
..and before you jump on me - yes I now usenet has plenty of text groups - but lets not ignore the fact that binaries exist, or is the main use for many.
mikerr isn't it part of the safeharbour defense?
if anyone issues them with a takedown notice for the specific posts they will get taken down?
throw new ArgumentException (String, String, Exception)
Yup .... if they can show they they have procedures in place to deal with illicitly placed copyright material, yes. It provides some cover fir "innocent" companies whose legitimate services are being abused, but certainly isn't a piracy charter for companies just paying lip-service to it..
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
I was under the impression from friends that they are under the common carrier laws so they cant be prosecuted.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)