Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,060 times in 719 posts

    News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    Simplified tools and buddy scheme reportedly planned.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,474
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    140 times in 116 posts
    • BobF64's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7-3770K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair XMS3 PC3-12800
      • Storage:
      • Multiple HDD and SSD drives
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS DUAL-GTX1060-06G
      • PSU:
      • 750W Silverstone Strider Gold Evolution
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT02
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP ZR24w

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    Good, things like Wikipedia should require some level of skill to edit, otherwise anyone and everyone edits things and posts crap and someone has to go around cleaning it up.

  3. Received thanks from:

    aidanjt (14-01-2011),Saracen (15-01-2011)

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    511
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked
    27 times in 22 posts
    • cameronlite's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P5K Premium
      • CPU:
      • Intel Q6600
      • Memory:
      • 4GB Corsair 1333mhz
      • Storage:
      • 128GB Corsair Force 3 SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI Twin Frozr AMD 5850 1GB
      • PSU:
      • XILENCE 600W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li P50r AMD Limited Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8 Professional 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer 243W 24", HP LA2405 24", Dell 2405 24"
      • Internet:
      • Virgin - 30Mb

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    That's a good point. You only really want people that intend to be regular contributors to be able to edit articles.

    For mistakes there should be a feedback form that is linked to each page so people that can make the changes, do.

    Ever been bored in an IT lesson? Wiki will become a sitting duck! (More so than it already is )
    Currently studying: Electronic Engineering and Artificial Intelligence at the University of Southampton.

  5. #4
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    944 times in 704 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    Quote Originally Posted by BobF64 View Post
    Good, things like Wikipedia should require some level of skill to edit, otherwise anyone and everyone edits things and posts crap and someone has to go around cleaning it up.
    My thoughts exactly. And more than skill. Putting thought into the edit is essential. I myself haven't bothered to learn the full range of wiki syntax, so when I do edit, I do put a bit of thought into what I'm doing before committing an edit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  6. #5
    Senior[ish] Member Singh400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,933
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked
    310 times in 247 posts

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    Quote Originally Posted by BobF64 View Post
    Good, things like Wikipedia should require some level of skill to edit, otherwise anyone and everyone edits things and posts crap and someone has to go around cleaning it up.
    Took the words right out of my mouth.

  7. #6
    Editable... jimbouk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    2,812
    Thanks
    244
    Thanked
    238 times in 191 posts
    • jimbouk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4 3200 MHz C16
      • Storage:
      • Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB NVMe PCIe M.2 2280
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Pulse RX 580 8GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Core Gold GC-650
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC-V1100 ATX
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC CU34G2/BK 34" Widescreen
      • Internet:
      • EE FTC

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    Any 14 kid can learn wiki markup easily enough so it in itself isn't going to be able to stop the trolls.

    There are plenty of wise people who, whilst I'm sure perfectly capable of learning it, would be put off by it and not contribute their knowledge to the world because of it.

  8. #7
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    944 times in 704 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    The idea isn't to stop trolls. Trolls will be trolls. The idea is to defer poor quality editing.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  9. #8
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    I find myself agreeing with both aidanjt and jimbouk.

    Editing being a bit arcane does put off, but not prevent, trolls and garbage editing, but similarly , it does deter quality posts from people with things to contribute but either a lack of time, or a lack of inclination to faff about.

    The problem is, is twits can be deterred, so can people with solid information, and if twits can persist and post anyway, so can people with solid info. I'm not convinced which category are more deterred, or quite where the balance should be between ease of use of tools, and monitoring/review of contributions.

    It's not an easy issue.

  10. #9
    jim
    jim is online now
    HEXUS.clueless jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    11,435
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked
    1,639 times in 1,304 posts
    • jim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • 10 Mbps ADSL

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    I honestly thought this was about the bureaucratic minefield and the self-obsessed prats that come up with reams and reams of policy, before undoing every edit that contains a miniscule error, and going back to buddy up with their wiki-friends.

    I spent ages figuring out the syntax so that I could start editing articles, and came across so many self-important sods who were more interested in reversing my work than improving it, that I just gave up in the end. There's a lot more to it than a complicated GUI.

  11. #10
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    944 times in 704 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    Yeah, there's definitely a lot of 'dont edit my stuff!' culture there.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  12. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,474
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    140 times in 116 posts
    • BobF64's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7-3770K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair XMS3 PC3-12800
      • Storage:
      • Multiple HDD and SSD drives
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS DUAL-GTX1060-06G
      • PSU:
      • 750W Silverstone Strider Gold Evolution
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT02
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP ZR24w

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    Finally, ive managed to post something good

    My opinion would probably be the reverse if all edits were submitted for moderation first, but I dont think that will ever happen, its just too much work.

    Whilst the current system isnt perfect, it still allows a lot of mistakes to appear until someone notices and corrects it.

  13. #12
    jim
    jim is online now
    HEXUS.clueless jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    11,435
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked
    1,639 times in 1,304 posts
    • jim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • 10 Mbps ADSL

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    Quote Originally Posted by BobF64 View Post
    Finally, ive managed to post something good

    My opinion would probably be the reverse if all edits were submitted for moderation first, but I dont think that will ever happen, its just too much work.

    Whilst the current system isnt perfect, it still allows a lot of mistakes to appear until someone notices and corrects it.
    The problem is that it goes against the whole wiki-ethos. Mind you, with time, they're moving further and further away from that ethos, because they've realised that it doesn't really work that well.

    Nonetheless, I think it would be a very long time before they gave up on it altogether.

  14. #13
    Senior Member chrestomanci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    1,614
    Thanks
    94
    Thanked
    96 times in 80 posts
    • chrestomanci's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus AMD AM4 Ryzen PRIME B350M
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 1600 @ stock clocks
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb DDR4 2666MHz
      • Storage:
      • 250Gb Samsung 960 Evo M.2 + 3Tb Western Digital Red
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Basic AMD GPU (OSS linux drivers)
      • PSU:
      • Novatech 500W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Sugo SG02
      • Operating System:
      • Linux - Latest Xubuntu
      • Monitor(s):
      • BenQ 24" LCD (Thanks: DDY)
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTTC

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    Quote Originally Posted by BobF64 View Post
    Good, things like Wikipedia should require some level of skill to edit, otherwise anyone and everyone edits things and posts crap and someone has to go around cleaning it up.
    I disagree.

    We don't want trolls and idiots editing Wikipedia without thinking, but you don't need to know wiki syntax to vandalise a page. Just hit enter a few times and type something offensive.

    For serous edits, we want to to set a reasonable bar of commitment and knowlege before people edit.

    In a technical area, it is reasonable to use knowledge of wiki syntax as that bar, as if someone is a good enough computer scientist to correct an article on 6502 assembler, then it is not much to ask for them to spend a few minutes leaning another syntax.

    However, for authors qualified to write articles outside scientific and technical fields, wiki syntax could be an overly high bar. If someone is an expert on Moorish art in tenth century Spain, then I don't want them put off writing about it because someone insists that they learn a strange syntax that has nothing to do with their field, I want that art expert to dive in and start typing.

  15. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,474
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    140 times in 116 posts
    • BobF64's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V Pro
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7-3770K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair XMS3 PC3-12800
      • Storage:
      • Multiple HDD and SSD drives
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS DUAL-GTX1060-06G
      • PSU:
      • 750W Silverstone Strider Gold Evolution
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT02
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • HP ZR24w

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    Quote Originally Posted by chrestomanci View Post
    I disagree.

    We don't want trolls and idiots editing Wikipedia without thinking, but you don't need to know wiki syntax to vandalise a page. Just hit enter a few times and type something offensive.
    My "good" was in relation to the topic, not plans to make it simpler to edit.

    Whilst its nice that anyone can edit, its one of the places most people shouldnt edit anything, but people dont seem to realise that.

    Maybe the answer is that every submission is randomly peer reviewed by other randomly picked editors, rather than moderated, its at least checked in a way that you cant easily compromise.

  16. #15
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    Quote Originally Posted by BobF64 View Post
    ....

    Maybe the answer is that every submission is randomly peer reviewed by other randomly picked editors, rather than moderated, its at least checked in a way that you cant easily compromise.
    Perhaps, but if the ideal is to have peer review, then it implies peers and that implies a level of expertise. How do you ensure the "random" editors reviewing something have the necessary expertise in, using the given example, 10th Century Moorish art, to know if what they're reading is correct, or merely highly plausible cobblers?

    That method may remove any "compromise" from having egotistical moderators, but it won't necessarily ensure quality is maintained.

    I suspect, ultimately, that if you want material of a quality you can be sure you can rely on, you have to go to a source that rigorously (and therefore probably expensively) vets it's contributions. Encyclopaedia Britannica, maybe, or a relevant and specialist magazine. Wikipedia, as I understand it, relies on the garbage being picked up by enough other people to flag issues, and if you use it (and I do for some things, but emphatically not for others) you just have to accept limited certainty as to voracity. If that isn't acceptable .... go elsewhere.

    Wikipedia is what it is, which is a good idea. What it is not, however, is a faultless Oracle of Delphi. We just have to accept the limitations, which are both it's biggest strength and at the same time, it's biggest weakness.

  17. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,894
    Thanks
    92
    Thanked
    84 times in 64 posts
    • miniyazz's system
      • CPU:
      • Acer Aspire 8920G
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Optoma HD700X projector @ c. 90"
      • Internet:
      • Really, really ****

    Re: News - Wikipedia founder admits site is too complex for many people to edit

    Requiring you to be a member would deter some vandals at least. IMO it would be worth the price of having one or two fewer useful edits - it's not much effort creating an account once, but when you have to create a new account for almost every edit, it becomes tedious..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 29-08-2009, 12:37 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •