Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: News - Facebook and Google join web future warning

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,070 times in 719 posts

    News - Facebook and Google join web future warning

    Web giants to turn on IPv6 for a promo day.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,894
    Thanks
    92
    Thanked
    84 times in 64 posts
    • miniyazz's system
      • CPU:
      • Acer Aspire 8920G
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Optoma HD700X projector @ c. 90"
      • Internet:
      • Really, really ****

    Re: News - Facebook and Google join web future warning

    I'm confused. What's happening? Are they turning off ipv4 that day? Or just turning ipv6 on? The latter doesn't really make sense, seeing as how you can already use the ipv6 versions. And does it mean 99.8% of people running on non-ipv6-compatible hardware? And how is this meant to raise awareness, unless it's actually turning ipv4 off..

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    11 times in 11 posts
    • BullDogg's system
      • CPU:
      • AMD Athlon II X3 720BE (Core unlocked)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2x HD4870 1GB (CrossfireX)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit

    Re: News - Facebook and Google join web future warning

    Basically, what they're doing is turning it on simultaneously. So, people who run IPv6 but don't realise it will go to that version.

    The benefit is that they can test all the IPv6 hardware out and make sure everything is running like it should be on a very large-scale. Even 0.2% of web users is a pretty big number of people, and a lot of those will go to one or all of yahoo, google and facebook in that day.

    The vast majority of users (and this is the idea) won't actually know what's going on, as it should be totally transparent - assuming all goes to plan.

    I think it's more to raise awareness among businesses and network providers/ISPs. If they see that high-traffic sites like Google and FB can do it, switching over a site that gets 'only' 10m hits per day should be easy.

  4. Received thanks from:

    miniyazz (15-01-2011)

  5. #4
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    11,193
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked
    1,091 times in 833 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2700X (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Patriot Viper 2 @ 3466MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB WD Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: News - Facebook and Google join web future warning

    Does this depend in any way, on if the ISP provides your router with an IPv6 or IPv4 address?

    Pretty sure all my hardware is capable.

  6. #5
    Senior[ish] Member Singh400's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,933
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked
    310 times in 247 posts

    Re: News - Facebook and Google join web future warning

    It is wholly dependent on your ISP I think.

  7. #6
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    944 times in 704 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: News - Facebook and Google join web future warning

    Doesn't make a slight difference to me. My ISP is still IPv4. Hell, I don't even think the crappy router they gave me even handles IPv6.

    Anyway, hopefully that'll change, it's getting a bit absurd that IPv6 equipment still hasn't been assigned addresses and taken the pressure off the IPv4 address pool.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  8. #7
    Comfortably Numb directhex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    /dev/urandom
    Posts
    17,074
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked
    1,027 times in 678 posts
    • directhex's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus ROG Strix B550-I Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 5900x
      • Memory:
      • 64GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Seagate Firecuda 520
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNOVA 850W G3
      • Case:
      • NZXT H210i
      • Operating System:
      • Ubuntu 20.04, Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 34GN850
      • Internet:
      • FIOS

    Re: News - Facebook and Google join web future warning

    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuit View Post
    Does this depend in any way, on if the ISP provides your router with an IPv6 or IPv4 address?

    Pretty sure all my hardware is capable.
    Entirely depends on your ISP.

    You need an IPv6 subnet for your network, and a DNS server with AAAA records, to be part of the glorious IPv6 future. Or you can go the lame route of 6to4, where you send all your IPv6 data to a bridging server, over IPv4.

    The global IP address overfiends, IANA, will completely run out of IPv4 addresses in about a month. IANA hands out IPs in blocks of /8, and they have *seven* left before they're out of a job (a /8 is 16 million IPs, i.e. a value for x in x.*.*.*). The regional authorities (AfriNIC, APNIC, ARIN, LACNIC and RIPE) are the ones who receive blocks from IANA, and they have varying numbers of free /24 blocks to hand out to companies (a /24 is 256 IPs, i.e. a set of values for x, y and z in x.y.z.*). AfriNIC has only used up about 40% of its allocation, and has about 200k /24's left - whereas ARIN has a whopping 0.5m left - but that's only 10% of their total allocation.

    Best estimates say the regional bodies will run out of IPs in Q3 or Q4 this year. From then, companies (read: ISPs) will no longer be able to get new blocks of IPs, and eventually end users like you or me will no longer be able to get new IPs.

    The biggest offenders for introducing IPv6 are the ISPs, IMHO - they NEED to have it in place, but are actively dragging their feet over putting IPv6 into place for consumers.

  9. Received thanks from:

    Biscuit (15-01-2011)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-11-2010, 05:24 PM
  2. News - Google and Facebook in data sharing row
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-11-2010, 11:41 AM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 14-10-2010, 02:06 PM
  4. News - Facebook overtakes Google in the US
    By HEXUS in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 17-03-2010, 05:27 PM
  5. News - Vatican learns from from Facebook, Google
    By HEXUS in forum Consumer Electronics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 15-11-2009, 03:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •