Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 27

Thread: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,060 times in 719 posts

    News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    Worker reportedly quit as firm continued to target innocent victims.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Now with added Ruffus Dog Tattysnuc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    1,373
    Thanks
    283
    Thanked
    207 times in 133 posts
    • Tattysnuc's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus 570X Strix F
      • CPU:
      • 3900X @ Stock
      • Memory:
      • 32Gb Rysen C18 Corsair
      • Storage:
      • 2x 1TB nvme
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2080 ti under Bykski water
      • PSU:
      • eVGA 850W
      • Case:
      • TT Core 5
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Lg 43"
      • Internet:
      • Utility Warehouse

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    Leagally threatening people is one thing... but THIS...... if true.... Well, whoever is the practicing lawyer/soliciter should have their license revoked. Very underhand.
    Join the HEXUS Folding @ home team

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    400
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked
    46 times in 39 posts
    • iworrall's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus B350M TUF Gaming
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 2700X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB C14 Team Group "Dark Pro"
      • Storage:
      • 512Gb Samsung 970 Evo NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia RTX3080 FE
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet 1KW
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Core V21
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 / Kubuntu 19.04
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator X34A
      • Internet:
      • Sky Fibre

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    Quote Originally Posted by Tattysnuc View Post
    Leagally threatening people is one thing... but THIS...... if true.... Well, whoever is the practicing lawyer/soliciter should have their license revoked. Very underhand.
    There is a word for this practice, that word is extortion. Extortion carries jail time. Andrew Crossley should be disbarred and jailed. That is all.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    29 times in 24 posts

    Post Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    Former employee said: "Some people will be tempted to pay, regardless of whether they think they have actually done anything, simply because of the desire to avoid embarrassment.

    Judge reportedly said: "Some people will be tempted to pay, regardless of whether they think they have actually done anything, simply because of the desire to avoid embarrassment


    A typo, a coincidence that they started with identical statements or did they have the same script?

  5. #5
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    944 times in 704 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    It has been pretty obvious for some time, that ACS:Law has been very happy to accuse innocent people of illegally downloading porn. £500 in exchange for a letter is pretty good going.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  6. #6
    Senior Member Pob255's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The land of Brum
    Posts
    10,128
    Thanks
    605
    Thanked
    1,220 times in 1,121 posts
    • Pob255's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus M5A99X EVO
      • CPU:
      • FX8350 & CM Hyper 212+
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 2gb Corsair Vengence 1600mhz cas9
      • Storage:
      • 512gb samsung SSD +1tb Samsung HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EGVA GTX970
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic GX 650W
      • Case:
      • HAF 912+
      • Operating System:
      • W7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • iiyama XB3270QS-B1 32" IPS 1440p

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    Actually there is a legal reason for it, morally it might well be questionable but legally I seem to remember that if someone accesses your wireless to commit an illegal you can be held jointly accountable.
    Same applies to if you use the internet at work to do something illegal, your work place will share a joint legal responsibility.

    EDIT it also shows they don't care about the actual issues of copyright and piracy just about making money.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    264
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    13 times in 13 posts

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    Quote Originally Posted by Pob255 View Post
    Actually there is a legal reason for it, morally it might well be questionable but legally I seem to remember that if someone accesses your wireless to commit an illegal you can be held jointly accountable.

    Same applies to if you use the internet at work to do something illegal, your work place will share a joint legal responsibility.
    In both cases you would have to show intent, unless your copyright theft is specifically sanctioned by the company, or the individual who's connection you're using, then they can't be charged with anything.
    Last edited by MonkeyL; 15-02-2011 at 04:18 PM.

  8. #8
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    Quote Originally Posted by Pob255 View Post
    Actually there is a legal reason for it, morally it might well be questionable but legally I seem to remember that if someone accesses your wireless to commit an illegal you can be held jointly accountable.
    Same applies to if you use the internet at work to do something illegal, your work place will share a joint legal responsibility. ....
    Oh, it's far less clear than that. In relation to the work stuff, yeah, the case may well be made, certainly in some types of civil matters, that the company is liable. Examples would be defamation. But significant in that would be company policies on employee use of the internet, and what steps they'd take, to prevent such abuses, such as staff training and, in some cases, monitoring (though that latter opens up another whole can of legal worms for the employer).

    But, MonkeyL raises a good point, that being the intent required for offences that aren't strict liability offences. And it also raises issues like the "common carrier" defence, referred to in the EU E-Commerce directive as the "mere conduit" situation.

    Having said that, anyone operating an open and unsecured WiFi connection, unless they deliberately and explicitly intend to do so, perhaps for social purposes, is either ignorant of the implications for their own security of doing so, or is a muppet if they know of those implications and still don't secure it.

    And, of course, that's far from uncommon. Several years ago, I scared the poop out of a friend with an unsecured wifi router by showing him some printed information he was shocked I could see. Needless to say, his router was secured about 2 minutes later, which was the point of the exercise. He got the message, loud and clear, especially when I offered to lock him out of his own router from my laptop, and from outside his home, and asked how how he'd explain it to the authorities if someone sat down the road in their car downloading child porn via his net connection. And how long he might sit under arrest in a police cell on child porn charges before he convinced them he knew nothing about it.

    And what that investigation, and what the arrest much less any charges that might result might do to his career as a computer security manager.

    And no, I'm not kidding about that last bit, on his occupation.

  9. Received thanks from:

    capt_cornflake (15-02-2011),jackvdbuk (16-02-2011)

  10. #9
    Senior Member mcmiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,404
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked
    50 times in 39 posts

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    Quote Originally Posted by Tpyo View Post
    Former employee said: "Some people will be tempted to pay, regardless of whether they think they have actually done anything, simply because of the desire to avoid embarrassment.

    Judge reportedly said: "Some people will be tempted to pay, regardless of whether they think they have actually done anything, simply because of the desire to avoid embarrassment


    A typo, a coincidence that they started with identical statements or did they have the same script?
    no typo youve changed what they have said

  11. #10
    jim
    jim is online now
    HEXUS.clueless jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Location: Location:
    Posts
    11,435
    Thanks
    612
    Thanked
    1,639 times in 1,304 posts
    • jim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z
      • CPU:
      • i5 2500K @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Sandisk SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX650
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT03
      • Operating System:
      • 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • 10 Mbps ADSL

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    I suppose if I leave my front door unlocked then I should be jointly liable for the theft of my own property.

  12. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    423
    Thanks
    63
    Thanked
    18 times in 17 posts
    • GaryRW's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte P35C DS3R
      • CPU:
      • Q6600 @ 3ghz
      • Memory:
      • DDR2 4gb
      • Storage:
      • Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 8800GT
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520w
      • Case:
      • Antec P182
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 2032BW

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    Quote Originally Posted by Pob255 View Post
    Actually there is a legal reason for it, morally it might well be questionable but legally I seem to remember that if someone accesses your wireless to commit an illegal you can be held jointly accountable.
    Just to add to what others have said, that was just one of the issues that the judge raised when considering the applications for default judgment ACS Law / Crossley made. iirc the judge at that time made the point that there was no settled law in England about it. Hang on, google will help my memory... Here we go:
    Quote Originally Posted by HHJ Birss QC
    The Particulars of Claim include allegations about unsecured internet connections. I am aware of no published decision in this country which deals with this issue in the context of copyright infringement. The German Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) dealt with a similar case in its judgment of 12th May 2010 – I ZR 121/08 – Sommer unseres Lebens (Summer of our lives). According to the court's press release the German Supreme Court decided that the owner of the unsecured wireless internet router accused of being involved in a sharing network on the internet could be subject to an injunction to secure their router but was not liable to pay damages. I mention this decision not to decide the point but simply as an illustration of the complex and significant legal issues arising.
    In the final hearing, he went on to say:
    Quote Originally Posted by HHJ Birss QC
    27. The Particulars of Claim also mentioned unsecured internet connections and tied in with that alleged infringement by the individual defendant either by infringing themselves or "by allowing others to do so". The judgment notes that I am aware of no published decision in this country which deals with the issue of unsecured internet connections in the context of copyright infringement and refers in passing to a decision of German Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) on the point. The point about "allowing" is that the word used in s16(2) of the 1988 Act is "authorising" not "allowing". They are by no means the same and the difference may be very important if the allegation is about unauthorised use of an internet router by third parties.
    ...
    30. But the argument is based on equating "allowing" and "authorising" and on other points. What if the defendant authorises another to use their internet connection in general and, unknown to them, the authorised user uses P2P software and infringes copyright? Does the act of authorising use of an internet connection turn the person doing the authorising into a person authorising the infringement within s16(2)? I am not aware of a case with decides that question either. Then there is the question of whether leaving an internet connection "unsecured" opens up the door to liability for infringement by others piggy backing on the connection unbeknownst to the owner. Finally what does "unsecured" mean? Wireless routers have different levels of security available and if the level of security is relevant to liability - where is the line to be drawn? No case has decided these issues but they are key to the claimant's ability to solve the Saccharin problem and say – one way or another there is infringement here.
    Reading the final judgment in the case, the Judge was so unhappy with the whole letter writing scheme, he was seriously considering ordering that no further letters demanding money could be written unless and until a test case was properly dealt with and issues about e.g. unsecured wireless connections or problems relying on IP addresses were dealt with properly. It seems he only gave up on that because Media CAT and ACS Law went out of business. The Judge made it clear that he thinks there should be a condition like that imposed before any other ISP's give up customer details based on IP addresses.

    Just in case anyone else is as sad as me, the various judgments are here:

    Original Default judgment issue: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWPCC/2010/17.html

    further judgment when the judge took it upon himself to find all the other MediaCAT / ACS law claims and order a directions hearing to consider all of them together: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWPCC/2010/18.html

    Final hearing: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWPCC/2011/6.html

  13. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    29 times in 24 posts

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    Quote Originally Posted by mcmiller View Post
    no typo youve changed what they have said
    Possible I made a mistake but I both read it that way and copypasta'd it here (I deleted the intervening text to make it clear, next time I'll leave it as a record), so maybe corrected without comment?

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    140
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    Well investigation comes rather late. Surely ACS Law should be pursued for their criminal actions. How can they make hundreds of thousands off innocent victims and get away without an repercussions?

  15. #14
    Senior Member oolon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,294
    Thanks
    150
    Thanked
    302 times in 248 posts
    • oolon's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P6T6
      • CPU:
      • Xeon w3680
      • Memory:
      • 3*4GB Kingston ECC
      • Storage:
      • 160GB Intel G2 SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX HD6970 2GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850
      • Case:
      • Antec P183
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Ultimate and Centos 5
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2408WFP
      • Internet:
      • Be* Unlimied 6 down/1.2 up

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    The problem with all of this for me to destroys my "encryption" argument. I used to say using public key encryption for all sites to protect your credit card details was using the wrong solution to fix the wrong problem (point being you care if you nearest and dearing know your downloading porn however some in oz you never heard of or will meet is less of a problem, however making sure others cannot use your CC details is prime importance). Now we seem to have blackmailers everywhere, using a "legal" pretence.
    (\__/) All I wanted in the end was world domination and a whole lot of money to spend. - NMA
    (='.*=)
    (")_(*)

  16. #15
    Hello jackvdbuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Stratford
    Posts
    2,513
    Thanks
    468
    Thanked
    112 times in 95 posts
    • jackvdbuk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • AbiT IP35-PRO
      • CPU:
      • Intel C2Q Q9550
      • Memory:
      • OCZ Nvidia SLi Edition 4GB (2x2gb) pc2-6400 DDR2
      • Storage:
      • lots of TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • BFG 8800GTS 512MB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX620W
      • Case:
      • Corsair 800D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Premium x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2407WFP
      • Internet:
      • Orange (about 6Mb)

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    Quote Originally Posted by snootyjim View Post
    I suppose if I leave my front door unlocked then I should be jointly liable for the theft of my own property.
    I disagree, people know full well how to operate a front door locking mechanism, the internet is for some MUCH more complicated and when people, if they bother at all try to "secure"
    their net, or cannot connect to thier router when secured, they will usually just leave it open.. after all its simpler that way rather than spending possibly hours working out how to connect, or change settings to make the bloody thing work!

  17. #16
    Admin (Ret'd)
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,481
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    3,208 times in 2,281 posts

    Re: News - BBC investigation uncovers goings on at ACS:Law

    Quote Originally Posted by snootyjim View Post
    I suppose if I leave my front door unlocked then I should be jointly liable for the theft of my own property.
    Not criminally, obviously .... unless it was a conspiracy with the thief. But you'd almost certainly invalidate your insurance, and that can happen if you don't have and/or use the locks they stipulate.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. BBC releases 79 online news reports from archives
    By Bob Crabtree in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-01-2006, 10:28 AM
  2. BBC News gone down the plughole?
    By FatBoab in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 17-10-2005, 11:02 PM
  3. BBC culls Cult website
    By Steve in forum HEXUS News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-07-2005, 01:47 PM
  4. BBC overhaul planned : good or bad news ?
    By Lee H in forum Question Time
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-03-2005, 09:17 PM
  5. Lame BBC News Article on Modding
    By aeonf242 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-05-2004, 09:31 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •