Read more.Quote:
And then there were four.
Printable View
Read more.Quote:
And then there were four.
Oh dear one less choice of drives, I have avoided Hitachi ever since they bought IBM as i suffered from having several "Death-Star" drives, including a glass platter one. I guess I will now be avoiding WD, which is a shame as they were my second choice after seagate. Does this mean WD will also get Hitachi's san business?
Hopefully Hitachi's SAN business is their *sole* interest in it.
I imagine it's mostly that, a few pieces of IP & patents and some factory capacity.Quote:
Originally Posted by aidanjt
Avoiding Hitachi drives because of years old problems with DeskStar drives is uncalled for, those problems are long history and Hitachi have a good enterprise level offering, and that's where reliability counts the most.
Found the recent desktop drives to be pretty good.
had an old IBM 40gb that failed and a couple of earlier hitachis doa/failed with click of death though.
Exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by kingpotnoodle
It's a shame to see less choice in the marketplace, but it's almost worth it if it will finally put paid to the tired old "Deathstar" meme.