Read more.Clockbump keeps Bulldozer at bay.
Read more.Clockbump keeps Bulldozer at bay.
Is it just me or is this chip a little redundant considering the 2600K has an unlocked muliplier![]()
So, that's six cores plus an extraneous one at the end - still leaves us a core short though...... AMD's FX-8150 six-core Bulldozer core ...I know the whole cores v. modules thing is a bit confusing with bulldozer, but I didn't think it was that bad...
Innocent mistake? =P
The 2700k is a little redundant, what it means is that generally the 2700k will have better quality silicon and thus be more overclockable but Intel of course only look for it to run stable at 3.9Ghz so really what you get as on overclocker is slightly less of a gamble (an increased chance that you're receiving superior silicon).
I ordered a 2700k today from (as far as I could find out) the only supplier in the UK who has actually just got them in stock, it cost me only £5 more than a 2600k and it's been dispatched for delivery to me tomorrow!
Yes I am overly excited because I woke this morning ready to order a big upgrade for me which was planned to be the 2600k, this would have been awesome as well but clearly I've had a nice result!![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
abit.care@HEXUS