They should make the Tv licence like the cable channels instead of paying for a Tv licence as they like to call as we all no it's a BBC licence, you should only need to purchase a BBC licence if you actually watch the BBC and not the other channels that use adverts to maintain there services. I would love to see how many people would opt out of watching the BBC as to not paying for it then.
I'd rather pay for BBC.....of course, if your a brain-dead-reality-TV-show-nut, then it's a different ballgame....
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
It all gets a bit confusing because iplayer includes past programmes as well as live tv.
That aside, I can't see how this can be implemented properly as it's a household thing. Can you watch iplayer in a building with no tv licence if you live in a household with a tv licence? *scratches head*
Hmmm. Interesting.
It;s worth pointing out, I think, that the Guardian said one thing (when quoting a BBC spokespernson) and the HEXCUS article said something rather different.
but the Guardian saidOriginally Posted by HEXUS articleThe way I read that is that neither the BBC nor the Guardian are saying that only 0.2% use iPlayer. They are saying that only 0.2% use iPlayer without ever receiving live broadcasts, which is, of course, very different.Originally Posted by Guardian
This is not a point about the prospect of licencing iPlayer reception, as anyone receiving live (or almost live) broadcasts needs a licence anyway. And if a requirement for a licence to receive iPlayer were introduced, that figure success that it'll make no difference at all to 99.8% of households, as they either don't watch iPlayer, or don't have a TV (or at least, don't have a licence for it).
Don't think about buildings, think about "households". It might become clearer.
If the building is a family home, occupied by one family, then it's one building and one household, so it's one licence needed. If it's a block of flats, it's one per household, which will be probably be one per flat, but certainly not one per building. If it's a single flat with multiple, individual occupants, (like many student flats) then it all depends on the arrangements. If the lease is a single lease to which all occupants are bound, then it's one household. If, though, each occupant has a separate rental agreement, and therefore typically a locked/lockable room, then those separate rooms require a licence, though a TV in a common area could be used by all under one household licence. But anyone other than the person holding that licence would need a licence for a TV in their own room.
All as I understand it, of course. And, assuming it hasn't changed recently.
Confused yet?
This was along similar lines that I was thinking. Very soon you'll have to by a licence for any device that's even capable of watching the iPlayer. And given the TV Licensing peoples way of thinking it'll be a case of:
"I see you've just got a new PS3 there, sonny. Well, I'm afraid that now makes you a criminal until we decide otherwise."
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
If they manage to produce a system where I get to pay one fee to watch ad-free television however I like and when ever I like then I'll be happy.
/Start rant
Recording television isn't good enough and I'm fed up with the pathetic choice when it comes to sport, 10 games being played in the premier league on the weekend and only 3-5 of them viewable live on TV... pathetic. We had more than 20 sport channels in South Africa in 2004, there was 1 for every single sporting event in the Olympics and you had the option to choose what athlete you wanted to watch if 1 event had multiple games running concurrently. 7 years later Sky boasts about having 4 sports channels, it's shameful.
/end rant
Why can't this utter crap of a license fee be scraped? What good TV shows does BBC have?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)