Read more.Something is 20 per cent faster than the GALAXY S III with 1080p screen, but what?
Read more.Something is 20 per cent faster than the GALAXY S III with 1080p screen, but what?
Now this sounds interesting
Wow (shadowsong): Arthran, Arthra, Arthrun, Amyle (I know, I'm inventive with names)
We need some galaxy note 2 benchmarks leaked to compare. That's supposed to be a fast dual core and has a powerful gpu.
7" 1080p display...Wow, that'll be useful! :-/
I have to say, I recently made the plunge and swapped my 768p device for a 1536p one (you know the one!), it's fatter, heavier, less comfortable to hold and the glass is stupidly far from the display, however, the screen is more impressive than I expected. Eye strain still isn't on Kindle level but not being dizzied by sub-pixel glittering is a big step - which is needed as Kindle still isn't responsive/suitable for some documentation/web documentation.
The author should be careful when referring to the htc one x ... as the international model uses a quad core nv tegra 3 chip, it's only the usa 4g version that has the 8960 in it due to the lack of 4g support by tegra 3.
Though benchmarks have shown the dual a15 core trounces the quad a9 most of the time.
The adreno series usually looks great on paper but then benchmarks really poorly perhaps this unknown device runs android 4.1 and that solves the lack of real performance.
Also since when does a bench at 1794x1080 mean it has a 1920x1080 screen ? it could have a 1794x1080 screen for all the author. Which is almost 16:10
Hmm, this is interesting.
That's supposed to be a fast dual core and has a powerful gpu.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)