Originally Posted by
crossy
Hmm, I remain to be convinced - metro only becomes a selling point if (and at the moment it's a big "if" as far as I'm concerned) you see a lot of useful apps - preferably pushed by a simple to use and cheap app store.
I remember being told that Active Desktop was going to be "a major paradigm shift" and then that Vista Gadgets "would change the way we all work" - no and no. Then again, maybe Metro is MS's "third time lucky".
Plus, he says refilling his bucket with more cold water, you're assuming that phones and tablets are going to sell in bucketloads. Not a safe assumption I'd say - given that they're up against very strong Android and iOS competition. We've all seen the comments here on how much a lot of people (dangel excepted) "like" desktop Metro (ie they don't), and the XBox implementation only works well if driven by Kinect - which means it needs you standing up (I know they're working on that) and with a lot of free space to move in.
Getting back to the article - MS makes a loss - "big deal" says I. They took a gamble and it didn't pay off - so now they're writing it off. That still leaves the rest of the divisions ticking over nicely thank you very much. So at worst this is a "blip" - nothing more.
Oh, and what is it with this implication that just because IBM pulled out of the PC market, they somehow "failed". Last time I checked ole Big Blue was doing very well indeed - market conditions permitting of course.