LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksRead more.Write it again, properly this time, you’ve got 24 hours, he says.
Read more.Write it again, properly this time, you’ve got 24 hours, he says.
Nice One Judge.
Shame on you Apple for attempting to pull the wool over the sheeple's eyes, especially for being caught red-handed doing so.
I hope this sends a clear message that our legal system isn't a toy for large corporations who can't play nice.
Apple think they are being clever, but this really brings into focus how out of touch and stupid their management is at a senior level.
Boardroom heads should roll to protect shareholders from such stupidity!
this judge is a 21st century hero!
A hard to come upon example that courts are not always "to do the law, not justice". Well done on this case. Waiting for the link to appear.
15% drop in shares and they pull this, a dying company, shame as they did push the design boundaries but deserved on the innovation front.
“This is Apple. They cannot put something on their website?”
Correctamundo!
Comedy gold, unfortunately shading a more sinister beast below. Frankly, at this point and massive great fine (preferably to go to charities!) would be in order: something to give Apple a wrap on the knuckles, to bruise that gargantuan, hideous, misplaced ego of theirs, and also do some good in this world rather than feeding this litigation machine.
But that won't happen.
LOL owned.
When I read the statement on Apple's site I must admit I thought if the judge see's this he's not going to be happy. Well done Judge Jacob for taking such a firm line.
Word, It's nice to see a legal system not getting rich off the patent disputes, caused by apple. Here in the US I see a lot of hate going towards Judge Lucy Koh, her ruling and handling of the case clearly indicates she's getting her pockets lined with cash.Originally Posted by Scribe
This judge is Great! as much as I like Apple products; I hate the way that Apple is run, they act like a bunch of four year-olds and it is nice to see a judge not letting these big corporations do what they want.
Lol, too true mateFair play to the judge.
Jon
finally someone putting crapple in their place
The funny thing is, companies who make genuinely cool products do not need to tell the world that their products are 'cool' whilst their competitors' are not.
Exclaiming that your products are cool is in itself fail at being cool.
no swearing please - admin.
Last edited by Tarinder; 02-11-2012 at 09:57 AM.
As a retired attorney, I laugh at this as totally asinine, arrogant behavior on the part of this Judge. Apple complied word-for-word with his order as to what was to be published. Then freedom of speech applies. The Judge has NO business prohibiting Apple from directly quoting from the Judge's comments in explaining his decision! Nor has he the authority to prohibit Apple from telling its customers and shareholders what other courts in other countries have ruled. Another Little Lord Fauntleroy in the court system!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
