Well it's not a post code lottery, for the most part you can tell before moving in to a property what it's prospects are. The main issue is things can change. Water company nocked 10mbits+ off the speed of my line one day, wasn't until I changed to FTTC it got fixed.
In your case you talk of paying tax, sod off. The broadband for rural areas is already subsidised and like all of these subsidies, it perverts things. Rather than convert an exchange which has tens of thousands of users, they are prioritising certain areas (such as parts of Cornwall) were they will be connecting only a few hundred. My parents in Cornwall get great speeds and performance from a cheap package because the exchange is so un-contested. It sickens me.
Most rural areas in fact are a net drain on the kitty, especially for infrastructure. People generally earn less through income taxation, a lot less, then get subsidies for local infrastructure projects. Meanwhile there are parts of the capital which keep having their dates pushed back by BT due to re-allocation of resources to hook up one or two people vs the thousands of customers. We pay for that out of tax, we pay for the income for BT to do that from tax.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote




