Initial launch of netbooks were quite good - they were cheaply made and sold for the kind of prices that 7" tablets go for these days - so almost disposable items. Then someone (and I personally am going to point the finger of blame firmly at Microsoft here) managed to persuade the manufacturers to slap on a feature-limited copy of Windows on them and bump up the price by 50%.
If the price had remained at it's initial point and the manufacturers hadn't crippled those initial versions with the worst versions of Linux they could find and had stuck to them as Linux boxes, then perhaps we'd be talking about netbooks now. As it stands the last time I saw a netbook was in the "price reduced" sections of Argos and PC World. It is an ex-form factor, it is ceasing to be.
Probably right to an extent - problem with this is that it's the full version of Win8 that's wanted, not that "RT" mule (look at the sales of the Surface). So that means a decent performance and a touchscreen are needed. And that means less battery life and more cost. And while Intel undoubtedly have a huge talent pool, ARM based phones and tablets have such a lead as to surely be unassailable? The smart move for Intel is to accept they've lost the tablet processor "war" and focus on the next "greatest thing" instead (Google Glasses, smartwatches, etc?)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote