Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 27

Thread: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    The 4096 stream processor packing card offers 8.6TFLOPS of performance.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Anthropomorphic Personification shaithis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Last Aerie
    Posts
    10,857
    Thanks
    645
    Thanked
    872 times in 736 posts
    • shaithis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77 WS
      • CPU:
      • i7 3770k @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 32GB HyperX 1866
      • Storage:
      • Lots!
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Fury X
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T (White)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Dell 3007
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb Fibre

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    So at 4k its about 50-60% faster than a 290x....considering HBM (and the 4096bit interface), that's probably the best case scenario.

    Doesn't look too shabby

    Now to see what nVidia will counter with...
    Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
    HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
    HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
    Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
    NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
    Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    ATLANTIS
    Posts
    1,207
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    28 times in 26 posts

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    naaaaa am just waiting for the R9 395 X2 with 16GB HBM GDDR5 Dual GPU it will kill anything Nvidia has ever made with a fatality beyond index.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    208
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    7 times in 5 posts

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    I'm waiting for whichever gives the best performance for the price in games I play.

    Which REALLY should be the opinion most people judge their purchases on.

  5. #5
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    11,193
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked
    1,091 times in 833 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2700X (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Patriot Viper 2 @ 3466MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB WD Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked



    Master-class in how to deceive people with graphs right there!
    Really hope they don't hold back with this for too much longer.

  6. #6
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,023
    Thanks
    1,870
    Thanked
    3,381 times in 2,718 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    IF it's real, then it reflects very poorly on AMD's standards of openness and data representation, something they've claimed to be leaders at with their 'open' APIs etc.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,207
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked
    114 times in 102 posts

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    so based on gpu design being 'consistent' there's about a 35-40% increase based purely on clock and stream processors increases....these would obviously improve performance even with the same architecture.

    With the game performance gains of about 50-60% the actual year on year gain is only really about 10-20% (at best) against the 290X at higher res 4K res....

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    464
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    30 times in 23 posts
    • Bagpuss's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Pro Wi-Fi
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9-9900K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4 3400
      • Storage:
      • Gigabyte 512GB NVMe SSD, Crucial 1Tb NVMe SSD, 6Tb Seagate 7200
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 2080 Black Edition
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 850 RMx 850 Gold
      • Case:
      • Fractal Meshify C Copper Front Panel
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG UK850 27in 4K HDR Freesync/Gsync
      • Internet:
      • Three Mobile 4G Unlimited Data (35-45Mbit)

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    Quote Originally Posted by MercutioUK View Post
    I'm waiting for whichever gives the best performance for the price in games I play.

    Which REALLY should be the opinion most people judge their purchases on.
    ..there are other factors to consider, at the time I switched from AMD to Nvidia, there was no driver level super sampling or hardware assisted in game video recording, not to mention i could run 2 nvidia 970's on my 650w Superflower PSU which would not have been possible with two Radeon 290's.

    AMD have since added the super sampling and video recording features to their drivers, but I'm not too hopeful the heat and power requirements have been addressed with these new cards, I'll have to wait for reviews to see if they have, and if so, I'd definitely have no problem going back to AMD.

  9. #9
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,023
    Thanks
    1,870
    Thanked
    3,381 times in 2,718 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    Quote Originally Posted by LSG501 View Post
    With the game performance gains of about 50-60% the actual year on year gain is only really about 10-20% (at best) against the 290X at higher res 4K res....
    Which is pretty impressive given we're still on 28nm and you'd expect diminishing returns from increasing density and die size. nVidia have the same problem with Titan-X.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    162
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    15 times in 9 posts
    • nitro912gr's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabretooth 990FX R2.0
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II x6 1090T
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB Kingstone Beast 2133Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung Evo 850 250GB, 2x WD Caviar Black 640GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX Radeon 7850 DD 1GB
      • PSU:
      • XFX ProSeries 450W Core Edition
      • Case:
      • CoolerMaster N300
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2313HM

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    nice but this is beyond my needs, I wait to see what AMD will offer in the mid range tier.
    (But to be honest, I don't yet feel my 7850 isn't delivering on what I play)

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    I find it remarkable that the 295X2 is still faster than the new Titan X after browsing several benchmarks for Nvidia's new card today, and only costs around £520. There's no way the Titan X is good value when its bested by a significantly cheaper, 1+ old card.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    162
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    15 times in 9 posts
    • nitro912gr's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabretooth 990FX R2.0
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II x6 1090T
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB Kingstone Beast 2133Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung Evo 850 250GB, 2x WD Caviar Black 640GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX Radeon 7850 DD 1GB
      • PSU:
      • XFX ProSeries 450W Core Edition
      • Case:
      • CoolerMaster N300
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2313HM

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    Quote Originally Posted by sweatyBallacks View Post
    I find it remarkable that the 295X2 is still faster than the new Titan X after browsing several benchmarks for Nvidia's new card today, and only costs around £520. There's no way the Titan X is good value when its bested by a significantly cheaper, 1+ old card.
    I was thinking the same, it looks like just a card for fanboys with tons of cash, that nVidia made just to temporary get the crown of "the fastest single gpu card".
    Just like with the first titan that was blown out by the 290X a few months after it was out.

    If you like nVidia cards just wait for the next generation from both amd and nvidia, both will be better and cheaper than the titan

  13. #13
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,023
    Thanks
    1,870
    Thanked
    3,381 times in 2,718 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    Quote Originally Posted by sweatyBallacks View Post
    There's no way the Titan X is good value when its bested by a significantly cheaper, 1+ old card.
    To be fair, it's not trying to be good value, at least not in the sense of outright performance for the price. However, like many luxury goods, there are people willing to pay more for a solid, reliable single GPU product with nice cooler and more RAM than they need. The lack of FP64 compute is a bit of a blow for those who wanted an elite all rounder though.

  14. #14
    don't stock motherhoods
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,298
    Thanks
    809
    Thanked
    125 times in 108 posts
    • Millennium's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI X470 Gaming Plus
      • CPU:
      • AMD 3600x @ 3.85 with Turbo
      • Memory:
      • 4*G-Skill Samsung B 3200 14T 1T
      • Storage:
      • WD850 and OEM961 1TB, 1.5TB SSD SATA, 4TB Storage, Ext.
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 3070 FE HHR NVidia (Mining Over)
      • PSU:
      • ToughPouwer 1kw (thinking of an upgrade to 600w)
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define S
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 101 Home 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • HiSense 55" TV 4k 8bit BT709 18:10
      • Internet:
      • Vodafone 12 / month, high contentions weekends 2, phone backup.

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    Personally I *think* I just have too much respect for the pound (I remember when a choco bar was 20p) to be spending £250 on a Graphics Adaptor.

    There are a lot of people who do get a lot of enjoyment from gaming, it's a massive ecosystem, but to do it properly the barrier to entry has gotten a smidgen high. Maybe that's progress (anyone think so?) but for me I am a little too nostalgic for the good old Voodoo 2 days to be spending twice what that cost me on a card that won't do 100hz gaming.

    *The Above is a very ill informed ignorable opinion and based on a circumstance that could be 10 or 15 times better - please feel free to ignore that post*
    hexus trust : n(baby):n(lover):n(sky)|>P(Name)>>nopes

    Be Careful on the Internet! I ran and tackled a drive by mining attack today. It's not designed to do anything than provide fake texts (say!)

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    162
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    15 times in 9 posts
    • nitro912gr's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabretooth 990FX R2.0
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II x6 1090T
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB Kingstone Beast 2133Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung Evo 850 250GB, 2x WD Caviar Black 640GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX Radeon 7850 DD 1GB
      • PSU:
      • XFX ProSeries 450W Core Edition
      • Case:
      • CoolerMaster N300
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2313HM

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    To be fair, it's not trying to be good value, at least not in the sense of outright performance for the price. However, like many luxury goods, there are people willing to pay more for a solid, reliable single GPU product with nice cooler and more RAM than they need. The lack of FP64 compute is a bit of a blow for those who wanted an elite all rounder though.
    I read in a review that the cooler is not that nice. The card doesn't stop the fans at idle (burning 11W in idle doesn't sound hot at all) and with the blower type of cooler it sports can be really hot under load.
    When you give 1k for a card you expect at least a dual fan configuration and some serious cooling tech on it

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    342
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    27 times in 23 posts

    Re: Slides from AMD Radeon R9 390X WCE presentation leaked

    Quote Originally Posted by sweatyBallacks View Post
    I find it remarkable that the 295X2 is still faster than the new Titan X after browsing several benchmarks for Nvidia's new card today, and only costs around £520. There's no way the Titan X is good value when its bested by a significantly cheaper, 1+ old card.
    Remember the 295X2 launched for £1200. There's a good chance that if the 390X is competitive with the Titna, and AMd lowballs the price, Nvidia will drop the price of the Titan X or release a '980 Ti' with some bits cut off (e.g. drop to 6Gb RAM).

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •