Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

    Scientists cut microfluidic passages into a chip surface to liquid cool it efficiently.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    5 times in 4 posts

    Re: Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

    That sounds awesome, now let's wait 7645312 years before it's introduced to PC market.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    411
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    15 times in 11 posts

    Re: Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

    147 ml per minute is a mere 9 litres an hour. The pump in my water cooled pc is, from memory, 600 l/hr.

    This is going to make designing water cooled pc systems interesting. Maybe cooling in parallel loops from a central manifold rather than serial loops. Head pressure would seem to be a non issue. The problem remains removing the heat from the water, but this ought to accelerate trend towards radiators with larger slower moving fans, with no need for high pump pressure water will stay in radiators for longer - I suspect that means internal design of radiators may need to be reconsidered.

    Should also accelerate trend towards much quieter systems. A pump at 60 l/hour will be a lot less noisy than pump at 600 l/hr.

    Sadly will be a long time before available for home pc use

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    223
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    15 times in 10 posts

    Re: Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

    Hate to think how long this'd last if/when a cooling pump fails. At least with traditional blocks there's enough heat capacity to absorb enough heat to turn the machine off in time.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    29 times in 24 posts

    Re: Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

    Quote Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
    Hate to think how long this'd last if/when a cooling pump fails. At least with traditional blocks there's enough heat capacity to absorb enough heat to turn the machine off in time.
    Surely there is nothing stopping them from mounting a (comparatively) small metal block on top as a heatsink - it'd still be much lower profile than having an active cooler and would help to limit/slow fluctuations, as well as buying it time to shut down or throttle if the temp did rise.

  6. #6
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,231
    Thanked
    2,291 times in 1,874 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

    Ooooh, all sorts of questions and issues spring to mind:

    Firstly, I suspect it's a complex and potentially expensive process to micro-etch channels directly into the silicon. And we don't know how many chips they ruined in the process!

    Secondly, we're told that the water input temperature was kept at a constant 20 C - suggesting that either an external cooling source or a non-cycling system was used to maintain the input temperature.

    Thirdly, we're told what the chip temperature was, but not what he water outlet temperature was or how much heat the chip was meant to be dissipating.

    Fourthly, we get a comparison to "air cooling" - but is that active or passive? What heatsink - if any - was used? How much air flow? Why no comparison to traditional water cooling techniques?

    Sure, this is an interesting tech demo, but there are lots of cooling options out there and I don't see anything suggesting this is genuinely a better way to go about it than, for instance, cheap and easily fabricated pressed copper foam (anyone remember me trumpeting Versarien Cu a few years back?). So I don't see this being commercialised.

    OTOH, do a quick google about Altera's FPGA chips and you'll find some interesting reference to the military. So perhaps there's another reason we probably won't hear any more about this research in public...

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Enfield, London
    Posts
    277
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked
    17 times in 15 posts
    • TheDutyPaid's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Gryphon Z87
      • CPU:
      • i7 4770K
      • Memory:
      • 16GB
      • Storage:
      • 2TB and 500GB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus 560ti
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 750W
      • Case:
      • 1953 Bush AC-34 Radio now case
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 20" Samsung & 27" ASUS
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity, Fast :-)

    Re: Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

    The picture makes it look quite large, but just remember how small the pipes and connectors are. The CPU's could be built with a surround around them but that will be extra cost

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    12
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

    I wonder how much maintenance it would take to keep water channels 100 microns thick clean. Even with the best precautions, your average water cooled build is gonna get some gunk from the rad or even worse, biological gunk, building up. I'd say that'd clog this cooling up fairly rapidly. Probably not an issue for enterprise builds, but I anticipate bringing this to the consumer market will take some hurdles to jump.

  9. #9
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    96
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

    interesting!!

  10. #10
    Senior Member Xlucine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,160
    Thanks
    297
    Thanked
    188 times in 147 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus TUF B450M-plus
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB @ 3.2 Gt/s
      • Storage:
      • Crucial P5 1TB (boot), Crucial MX500 1TB, Crucial MX100 512GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 980ti
      • PSU:
      • Fractal Design ION+ 560P
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H

    Re: Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

    I like how they used Celsius when comparing the % difference between the temperature with that cooling and the temperature under air cooling, that 60% figure means nothing


    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    ...or how much heat the chip was meant to be dissipating.
    Assuming the water comes out the chip at 24 degrees C (since it can't have gotten any hotter than the chip), then 4 degrees C * 147 millilitres per minute * 4.2 joules per gram degree C gives roughly 40 watts. That's not an order of magnitude away from consumer desktop parts, but only just.

  11. #11
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    96
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

    could be the next step cooling solution !!!!!!!

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    185
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    7 times in 5 posts
    • Ironbuket's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock AMD X470 Taichi
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB (2x8GB) T-Force Dark Pro
      • Storage:
      • 1TB 970EVO M.2, 1TB 850EVO + many others
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX970
      • PSU:
      • Be Quiet Straight Power 750W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT02B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10x64 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Hyundai W240D v2 + Dell (both @1920x1200)
      • Internet:
      • Zen

    Re: Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

    If the channels the water flows through are so tiny and this is in direct contact with the silicon, then what is going to happen when they get clogged by debris? I guess a full proof filtration system is going to be an essential for this technology.
    2700X,X470 Taichi,Silverstone Fortress 2,16GB RAM, SSDx3, HDDx4,GTX970 G1 Gaming,24"x2(1xIPS,1xTFT),W10x64Pro
    HTPC: AthlonX2 5050e,M4A78-EM,AntecFusion,8GB RAM,ATi3200,32"Sony TV,W7x64Pre

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Georgia Tech researchers demo CPU 'on-die liquid cooling'

    The pump is slow but its not all negative. Smaller AIOS pump water so fast that not all the heat is release when it passes through the radiator. It can get to the point were the water in the loop is still pretty hot by the time it loops back to cool the cpu. People try to fix this with a bigger radiator to prolong the exposure to the fans. But with a lower flow rate the water will come out very hot and spend a lot longer time cooling down. I would assume that with the water colder hitting the cpu it will absorb more heat. That and the water being closer to the cores will help massively

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •