Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 3D XPoint memory chip samples "just around the corner"

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    3D XPoint memory chip samples "just around the corner"

    However it may be 12 to 18 months before mass production commences.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    145
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    11 times in 9 posts

    Re: 3D XPoint memory chip samples "just around the corner"

    3D XPoint looks very exciting for video production at 4k and beyond. Imagine being able to record RAW onto a 3D XPoint module, drop it straight into an editing rig and access footage at near RAM speeds.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    223
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    15 times in 10 posts

    Re: 3D XPoint memory chip samples "just around the corner"

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael H View Post
    3D XPoint looks very exciting for video production at 4k and beyond. Imagine being able to record RAW onto a 3D XPoint module, drop it straight into an editing rig and access footage at near RAM speeds.
    With SATA or NVMe your interface is the limitation already, with DIMMs .... well you have to invent some sort of hot-pluggable DIMM interface first. And that'd require new mainboards, new processors, new sockets, and new RAM. Which isn't going to happen anytime soon.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: 3D XPoint memory chip samples "just around the corner"

    micron coming backkk

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    ATLANTIS
    Posts
    1,207
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    28 times in 26 posts

    Re: 3D XPoint memory chip samples "just around the corner"

    ....delivering more than 95,000 IOPs at a 9ms latency, last time I checked the Intel SSD 750 can do 290,000 IOPs write but the details of latency 'milliseconds' is what I don't have.

  6. #6
    Evil Monkey! MrJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,209
    Thanks
    257
    Thanked
    412 times in 318 posts
    • MrJim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Tomahawk X570
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32gb Kingston 3600 DDR4
      • Storage:
      • Aorus 1Tb NVME SSD, Samsung 1Tb 970 Evo SSD, Crucial 2tb MX500 SSD, Seagate Ironwolf 4Tb SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 3080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 1300W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Meshify 2
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 11 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic 27" XG2703-GS
      • Internet:
      • BT 900 mb/s FTTP

    Re: 3D XPoint memory chip samples "just around the corner"

    Quote Originally Posted by lumireleon View Post
    ....delivering more than 95,000 IOPs at a 9ms latency, last time I checked the Intel SSD 750 can do 290,000 IOPs write but the details of latency 'milliseconds' is what I don't have.
    I think the figure of 95,000 IOPS is per chip - SSDs comprise many chips...

  7. #7
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    51
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    5 times in 4 posts

    Re: 3D XPoint memory chip samples "just around the corner"

    Shouldn't the latency be in microseconds (µs), instead of milliseconds (ms)? It's just a typo, but a hugely important one.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,894
    Thanks
    92
    Thanked
    84 times in 64 posts
    • miniyazz's system
      • CPU:
      • Acer Aspire 8920G
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Optoma HD700X projector @ c. 90"
      • Internet:
      • Really, really ****

    Re: 3D XPoint memory chip samples "just around the corner"

    My understanding was that SSDs had latency around the order of 0.1ms, not the 73ms mentioned in the article, with HDDs worse by a factor of 100 (latencies of 10-20ms). 73ms would be really slow (think running your operating system from a DVD drive slow) unless I'm missing something here.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    275
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked
    10 times in 4 posts
    • whatif's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Intel 4th gen NUC
      • CPU:
      • i3 4010u Intel NUC
      • Memory:
      • 32Gb 2400MHz HyperX
      • Storage:
      • Samsung XP941 256GB, 800GB Intel DC 3700
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Intel 4th gen i3 graphics
      • PSU:
      • Intle NUC power brick
      • Case:
      • Morex NUC Case
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit OEM
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq 24" or Samsung 32" TV
      • Internet:
      • Cable

    Re: 3D XPoint memory chip samples "just around the corner"

    Ah, presales hype and spin.
    Until they hit the market, we will probably be seeing a lot of typos and unreferenced figures.
    It is just like how journalists can take only part of a sentence out of a politicians speech and use that to make a point. But how do we know the context that part of a sentence had in the rest of the speech, apart from how the reporter presents it.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    223
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    15 times in 10 posts

    Re: 3D XPoint memory chip samples "just around the corner"

    Quote Originally Posted by enemys View Post
    Shouldn't the latency be in microseconds (µs), instead of milliseconds (ms)? It's just a typo, but a hugely important one.
    No. Milliseconds is correct. We're talking about enterprise workloads here, with dozens of commands in a queue, not one command at a time like on desktops. Some SSDs can have response times over one full second under these loads.

    Intel's P3608 datacentre NVMe SSD averages over 20 milliseconds in these workloads.

    http://www.storagereview.com/intel_s...vme_ssd_review

    Quote Originally Posted by lumireleon View Post
    ....delivering more than 95,000 IOPs at a 9ms latency, last time I checked the Intel SSD 750 can do 290,000 IOPs write but the details of latency 'milliseconds' is what I don't have.
    Under best case conditions, perhaps. In reality it does 55,000 IOPS read and 8,000 IOPS write in IOMeter 4K random tests.

    Quote Originally Posted by miniyazz View Post
    My understanding was that SSDs had latency around the order of 0.1ms, not the 73ms mentioned in the article, with HDDs worse by a factor of 100 (latencies of 10-20ms). 73ms would be really slow (think running your operating system from a DVD drive slow) unless I'm missing something here.
    What you are missing is this is not a consumer desktop product so you cannot compare it to your consumer desktop products under consumer desktop loads.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •