Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    29,046
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,868 times in 641 posts

    SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    And its 8GB HBM2 density components will hit mass production in Q4.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    15,070
    Thanks
    1,200
    Thanked
    2,250 times in 1,851 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 1x 8GB DDR4 2400
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    Surprised to see them suggest the 2GB cubes will only scale up to 2 cubes/system. I'd've thought they'd be the perfect choice for an 8GB high end GPU...

  3. #3
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    29,230
    Thanks
    1,526
    Thanked
    2,945 times in 2,386 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A UD3R rev 2
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon X5680
      • Memory:
      • 12gb DDR3 2000
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • O2 8mbps

    Re: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    How did the the time frame of HBM1 mass production announcement fit with the appearance of the Fury boards? I'm trying to work out if it looks like we're going to have to wait for 2017 for high end cards from nvidia/AMD.

  4. #4
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    15,070
    Thanks
    1,200
    Thanked
    2,250 times in 1,851 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 1x 8GB DDR4 2400
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    Hynix didn't announce mass production of HBM1 until June last year, and the Fury X launched early July. Samsung have already announced mass production of HBM 2 (almost 2 months ago, in fact). Not sure why SK Hynix are behind in the HBM2 stakes (since Samsung are apparently already mass producing 4GB stacks), but unless there are some exclusive supply agreements in place somewhere I don't think it'll affect the availability of high end graphics...

  5. #5
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    29,230
    Thanks
    1,526
    Thanked
    2,945 times in 2,386 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A UD3R rev 2
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon X5680
      • Memory:
      • 12gb DDR3 2000
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • O2 8mbps

    Re: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    but unless there are some exclusive supply agreements in place somewhere
    I'd be surprised if there weren't, given the cost/risks of new tech, but we can hope it's not the case.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    MOMBASA
    Posts
    890
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    23 times in 21 posts

    Re: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    THE same old FURY-X core but with HBM 2.0 with 8GB Memory will be awesome

  7. #7
    Anti-Viral Pleiades's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Amongst barbarians
    Posts
    941
    Thanks
    1,574
    Thanked
    56 times in 45 posts
    • Pleiades's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z-97 Gaming 5
      • CPU:
      • 4690K @ 4GHz / Phanteks TC-12DX
      • Memory:
      • 16 GiB HyperX
      • Storage:
      • Sandisk 480GiB; Transcend M.2 256GiB; Velociraptor 300GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Pulse RX580 8GiB
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet Straight Power 800w
      • Case:
      • CoolerMaster HAF932
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2005 20"; Qnix 27" 2560x1440 120hz IPS; Samsung 49" 9500 HDR UHD TV
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 70 Mibs

    Thumbs up Re: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    Quote Originally Posted by lumireleon View Post
    THE same old FURY-X core but with HBM 2.0 with 8GB Memory will be awesome
    Yes, with all the '2s': HBM 2.0, HDMI 2.0a, DP umm 1.3a , anyway, agree Fury 8GiBs would be great for UHD and VR, as long as the price doesn't go thru the roof....
    ------------------

    Valar Morghulis

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    503
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    45 times in 29 posts

    Re: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    Surprised to see them suggest the 2GB cubes will only scale up to 2 cubes/system. I'd've thought they'd be the perfect choice for an 8GB high end GPU...
    I guess it can be used if you want to, but they are targeting 2 stacks of 4GB for the 8GB configuration?

    Even though 8GB should satisfy every area of the consumer market's needs, surely 1TB/s would be nice on the higher end cards amongst these? I can only imagine due to willy waving the high end is coming with 16GB whether we need it or not!

  9. #9
    Senior Member Xlucine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,620
    Thanks
    236
    Thanked
    122 times in 104 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus TUF B450M-plus
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB @ 3.2 Gt/s
      • Storage:
      • Crucial MX500 1TB, Crucial MX100 512GB, 2TB hard disk
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 980ti
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12G-550
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 70 Mb/s

    Re: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    Hynix didn't announce mass production of HBM1 until June last year, and the Fury X launched early July. Samsung have already announced mass production of HBM 2 (almost 2 months ago, in fact). Not sure why SK Hynix are behind in the HBM2 stakes (since Samsung are apparently already mass producing 4GB stacks), but unless there are some exclusive supply agreements in place somewhere I don't think it'll affect the availability of high end graphics...
    There was this from last year:
    http://hexus.net/tech/news/graphics/...xs-hbm2-chips/

    ETA: I'd love to see a single 2GB stack turn up in an APU for VRAM, that'd be fun

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    MOMBASA
    Posts
    890
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    23 times in 21 posts

    Re: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    QUESTION 1: how much does a 2GB HBM 2.0 chip cost? Question 2: how much electricity does it use compared to DDR4/DDR3?. Question 3: Like the GDDR5 in the PS4 can HBM 2.0 be shared between GPU & CPU? Question 4: can you make a removable HBM 2.0 memory module just like DDR4?

  11. #11
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    29,230
    Thanks
    1,526
    Thanked
    2,945 times in 2,386 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A UD3R rev 2
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon X5680
      • Memory:
      • 12gb DDR3 2000
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • O2 8mbps

    Re: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    Quote Originally Posted by lumireleon View Post
    QUESTION 1: how much does a 2GB HBM 2.0 chip cost? Question 2: how much electricity does it use compared to DDR4/DDR3?. Question 3: Like the GDDR5 in the PS4 can HBM 2.0 be shared between GPU & CPU? Question 4: can you make a removable HBM 2.0 memory module just like DDR4?
    1) They're not out yet so we don't know.
    2) Sort of the wrong question to ask - both technologies can use different amounts of power based on what speed they're being asked to run at. HBM is a competitor for graphics ram, not system RAM, so the equivalent is GDDR5, and as the the article shows, HBM is much more power efficient than GDDR5.
    3) Yes, it can, should you design it that way.
    4) If you wanted to, yes. There doesn't exist a standard for that yet though as far as I know - much of the advantage of HBM is that it can be placed on an interposer next to the GPU. Having to trace between an HBM installation and the GPU/CPU would be cost/space/speed prohibitive I expect.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    MOMBASA
    Posts
    890
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    23 times in 21 posts

    Re: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    ^ Thanks @ Kalniel.

  13. #13
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    10,191
    Thanks
    518
    Thanked
    1,051 times in 895 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 30 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    Disagree with (4)

    The whole point of this is to closely couple with the device that needs memory. Placing the ram on a card rather than interposer increases trace lengths to go off chip, across a connector, back onto a chip. Then there is that connector. If you have a 1024 bit wide data bus, you probably need 2048 pins just to route the data. That would probably need LGA/PGA ram to get that many connections at a usable density.

    If you want to go off chip and onto a DIMM, then you want DDR4, because that is what it was designed to be good at.

  14. #14
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    29,230
    Thanks
    1,526
    Thanked
    2,945 times in 2,386 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A UD3R rev 2
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon X5680
      • Memory:
      • 12gb DDR3 2000
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • O2 8mbps

    Re: SK hynix schedules 4GB HBM2 mass production for Q3 this year

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    Disagree with (4)

    The whole point of this is to closely couple with the device that needs memory. Placing the ram on a card rather than interposer increases trace lengths to go off chip, across a connector, back onto a chip. Then there is that connector. If you have a 1024 bit wide data bus, you probably need 2048 pins just to route the data. That would probably need LGA/PGA ram to get that many connections at a usable density.

    If you want to go off chip and onto a DIMM, then you want DDR4, because that is what it was designed to be good at.
    That is kind of what I said still

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •